A CBS spokesperson rushed to the defense of the network’s censorship apparatus, giving statements to industry trade publications like Variety and Deadline, claiming that CBS Studios had actually financed and secretly produced the public-access episode in collaboration with Monroe Community Media. “As is our regular practice, we send copyright notices to unauthorized websites that post copyrighted content from CBS and our network/studio talent,” the spokesperson asserted, insisting the copyright enforcement was simply routine intellectual-property protection.

But that explanation raised more questions than it answered. Nothing in the broadcast identified CBS or Paramount as producers. There was no corporate copyright message at the end of the hour; instead, an independent, Chicago-based studio was listed as the production company. Colbert also spent much of the episode openly mocking Paramount and CBS in ways that strongly suggested they were not exactly thrilled with the project. So viewers were understandably skeptical that the corporation had lovingly funded an anti-corporate guerrilla comedy special only to immediately suppress its circulation online.

After a backlash erupted, CBS quickly retreated, announcing it would “waive further enforcement” pending additional review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Agreeing with you would mean not believing that AI is stealing from artists.

Right. How could it be when no theft has occurred?

It isn't stealing anything from anyone and artists have been making art long before the concept of property was even invented.

If you need a reason to justify the trendy "AI bad" narrative, there are plenty of others to choose from that aren't total bullshit.