this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
276 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

20075 readers
1629 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Guys... Youre trying to apply physics/logic to a supposedly all power deity. Just say the world was just created as is last Thursday or something in its current state. Like if your going to make shit up you don't have to make it so complicated. It's all BS anyway...

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is why I'm agnostic - it's basically impossible to either confirm or deny the existence of a higher power, but I don't believe in any particular gods or anything

[–] erev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Im largely the same. Im generally a non believer and my sense of spirituality is not tied to any deities, but I don't know that they're not out there so in vwry particular cases I still practife some amount of worship. Mainly at funerals.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There’s a whole field of philosophy that’s about how we can’t actually prove anything but the present exists

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I'm sure it's more complicated than that but on the face of it that sounds silly. "Proving" something implies causality, which implies some kind of temporal ordering...