this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
685 points (98.9% liked)

World News

55353 readers
3581 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 161 points 23 hours ago (30 children)

So, hey, Americans, your president is openly threatening genocide. You might uh, want to do something about that. Just a thought.

[–] alyth@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

"Americans"

They voted him into office, this is what "Americans" want

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 80 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

Open to suggestions.

I don't think any of y'all know how well protected this asshole is

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

“I want to make everything possible to stop this government- as long as it doesn’t make me involved in anything “ “I live too far from everything to do anything “ “Our politics doesn’t work that way, you don’t understand that” “We are the land of free and all the guns and something “

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 46 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

Seriously, there seems to be this delusion that we all just have magic buttons that execute our politicians on a whim. What the fuck do you expect us to do, specifically, to fix this?

[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 7 points 7 hours ago

You wrote exactly that delusion into your constitution. The only reason you still have guns after everybody else realised they were bad was so that you could use them to overthrow some mythical tyrannical government.

Now the tyrannical government is here. Use your guns you love so much. Overthrow it.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 44 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

In pretty much every other western country, the populace could reasonably exert force over their national armed forces because those armed forces are reasonably sized. But the entire active duty military of Germany has fewer personnel than the on-base population of a single US military base (JBLM 210k, Germany 185k), and JBLM is only the 4th largest base in the US....

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not to mention, our military budget is more than the GDP of 85% of the countries in the world, and it's only getting bigger. The proposed budget for next year is more than 90% of the world's countries' GDP. Think about that for a few minutes.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Dude the USA just de facto surrendered to Iran.

I don't think those ludicrous amounts of money that corporations embezzle via the military is at all representative of it's quality.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

oh, anything short of killing ourselves at the government will not be enough for the freaks on this website.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It's mind boggling to me there have been no riots by this point.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 23 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

If that's mind boggling then you really need to read an actual history book.

Life for the avg America is FAR from problematic enough to have riots start yet. Even our worse off tend to have just enough care from other Americans to be upset but content. We are taking care of our down trodden just enough.

You need starvation, active destress, or wide spread unemployment.

We have food it's just expensive.

We arnt in active physical danger.

We have just enough jobs that groups of people arnt massing together.

End of the day the very same message of help your fellow man, do good in your community and decades of social safety nets put into place. Are doing their job of allowing the American people to coast by happy enough.

If you want riots then you need to start making people physically miserable, scared and hungry.

[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 21 points 20 hours ago

You’re not wrong about the conditions that historically lead to unrest, material desperation, fear, and breakdown of basic stability tend to be the tipping points. The U.S. government isn’t there for most citizens, and that’s not accidental.

But what’s worth pointing out is that this “just stable enough” environment didn’t emerge naturally, it’s been actively managed over decades. And a strong case can be made that this is less about general governance and more about a long-term political strategy, particularly on the Republican side.

You’ve had a pattern where social safety nets are publicly criticized, underfunded, or slowly eroded but rarely eliminated outright. Why? Because removing them completely would create exactly the kind of instability you’re describing. Instead, they’re kept barely functional. Enough to prevent collapse, not enough to meaningfully improve mobility or reduce inequality.

At the same time, there’s been consistent resistance to policies that would shift people from “barely stable” to genuinely secure, things like stronger labor protections, universal healthcare, or aggressive wage growth. That keeps a large portion of the population economically stressed, but not desperate enough to unify or revolt. It fragments people using base animal instincts, keeps them focused on short-term survival, and limits collective action.

Add in cultural and political polarization, and it further diffuses pressure. People incorrectly channel frustration horizontally, at each other, instead of vertically at faceless institutions.

So yes, you’re right about the threshold for unrest. The uncomfortable part is recognizing that a lot of political strategy has been about keeping the country just below that threshold, stable enough to barely function, and strained enough to control.

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago

It's understandable that not everyone wants to riot for moral values and against mass corruption, but surely everyone can see that it's just a matter of time before distress comes to the USA if nothing is done right now? It's pretty naive to assume that your new enemies won't hit back in some way, and most of the world just wants the US to become a meaningless country, since everyone is sick of the constant abuse of power and its negative effects on the world economy and stability. To join riots right now is the least the American people can do. Throughout American history it was often needed for the many to fight the elite and that time has come again. To fight back or not, that's a personal decision.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

We arnt in active physical danger.

You arent in percieved active physical danger.

If trump launches a nuke boy that sure will change lickity split tho

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] biscuit 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't Americans decide that dead kids in schools was an acceptable price for the right to own guns, specifically so you can overthrow your government when needed?

You guys aren't even striking yet. You're just gonna allow this to happen. You guys elected him again, after it became clear he was a paedophilic capitalist working for the elite. America is lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Simultaneous angry mobs outside the white house and mar-a-lago could be nice. I would come out from California to join that.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Willoughby@piefed.world 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We didn't get up when we found out he was a pedophile. That ship kinda sailed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Artaca 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Someone may have replied with this already, but: https://stoptrumpswars.org/ we're trying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 29 points 22 hours ago

Its been proven that the impeachment doesn't do shit. Infact the last time we impeached our president he was allowed to run and be elected again.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Unanimously supported or is it again an isolated democrat move? Asking because it’s kindof annoying to let USA delete a whole civilization…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

You know they are too pussy ass about it, but you know freedum!

load more comments (24 replies)