pixxelkick

joined 2 years ago
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

I thought like, canonically, avada kedavra fucks up your soul or whatever everytime you use it and it slowly corrupts you or something

So it has a downside.

Also, to work, you have to be able to mean it and basically be a psychopath for it to even work right.

Isn't there explanations for why people dont just use it willy nilly?

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See my other post about how beauty can literally be found in anything, and how the practice of art is a lot like working out a muscle group. The act of finding beauty takes practice, its nothing to be ashamed about lacking as a practiced skill, but anyone can gain that skill by working at it.

But once you can find beauty in anything, even an apple sitting on a plate, it does become easier to find beauty in anything else, including oneself.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago
  1. Did you have MCP tooling setup so it can get lsp feedback? This helps a lot with code quality as it'll see warnings/hints/suggestions from the lsp

  2. Unit tests. Unit tests. Unit tests. Unit tests.

I cannot stress enough how much less stupid LLMs get when they jave proper solid Unit tests to run themselves and compare expected vs actual outcomes.

Instead of reasoning out "it should do this" they can just run the damn test and find out.

They'll iterate on it til it actually works and then you can look at it and confirm if its good or not.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that’s still really hard to do when you don’t like how you look.

Never said it was easy, just that it was important!

One of the best ways I found to discover beauty was practicing art. The process of discovering beauty in anything and anyone makes it a lot less challenging to then find beauty in yourself.

When you can look at a mark on your body and go "I love how this breaks up the negative space and adds an interesting dynamic rhythm to my features" you are on the path.

The human body is full of beautiful curves, contours, patterns, shapes.

And so are apples.

If I can find beauty in a picture of an apple sitting on a table, it sure isnt more challenging to see the same of my own reflection haha.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Some need awareness that external validation exists

Hard disagree, external validation is not a fundamental need.

Any perception that it is, is an internalized mental blocker (likely due to countless years of social conditioning)

Your cage is made of out of sticks.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

But what if I am the one who hates my body the most

That is still the only opinion that matters.

Matters, in the sense of "should determine action"

If 100 millionnpeople say you are ugly, they can go fuck themselves.

But if you say you are ugly, that matters and should be addressed and worked on.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I dunno Beholders have a tendency to think pretty highly of themselves though... 🤔

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

and unfortunately you ultimately need that person to be yourself

This just sounds like trying to make codependency sound good.

You dont need another person to be yourself wtf.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I actually dislike this.

The narrative that your value comes from external validation is one you see a lot.

But a person shouldn't be told that "you are beautiful based on another persons perspective" because that cuts both ways.

If you tell them this, it can easily be flipped around to say "okay but theres 10 million people on the internet who would love to call you ugly so thats 10 million to 1"

Instead, the only person whos opinion on your body that matters is YOU, and thats it.

And Ill keep banging that drum.

If I have a daughter, Im gonna tell her this all the time, "tell anyone who tries to convince you that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, that the beholder outta keep their fuckin opinions to themself"

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Theres also a massive distinction between consuming something necessary/important, vs consuming something 100% optional.

Harry Potter isnt food, shelter, or any other kind of critical necessity.

Theres literally countless better alternatives to Harry Potter media you can choose to consume from that doesnt directly put money straight into the pocket of someone actively funding direct harm

This isn't multiple layers of washing here, that money basically goes straight towards actively harming minority groups.

Its not even a good fucking book, and I used to be a fan of it as a kid, but I went back and read my old books and... it just fuckin sucks dawg, its not good lol.

Go pick like, any other fandom at least.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I mean for what its worth, if the dude has a partner they couldve just picked the kid up, its not exactly unheard of for one partner to do drop off and the other do pick up... kind of a lukewarm take here.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The difference, when the tool is used correctly, is so massive that only someone deeply uninformed or naive would contend it.

I got about 4 entire days worth of work completed in about 5 hours yesterday at my job, thats just objective fact.

Tasks that used to take weeks now take days, and tasks that used to take days now take hours. Theres no "feeling" about this, Ive been a software developer for approaching 17 years now professionally. I know how long it takes to produce an entire gambit of integration tests for a given feature. I spend almost all of my time now reviewing mountains of code (which is fairly good quality, the machines produce fairly accurate results), and then a small amount of time refining it.

People deeply do not at all understand how dramatically the results have changed over the past 2 years, and their biases are based on how things were 2 years ago.

Sure, 2 years ago the quality was way worse, the security was bad, the enforcement almost non existent, and peoples overall skill with how to use the tools was just beginning to grow. You cant exactly be good at using a tool that only just came out.

But its been two years of very rapid improvement. Its good now. Anyone who has been using these tools and actually monitoring progression can speak to this.

Things heavily shifted about 5 months ago when competition started to really fire up between different providers, and I wont say its even close to great yet, but its definitely good, it works, its fast, and it's pretty damn good at what I need it to do.

 

So, my fiance and I have for quite awhile come to terms with us being poly, primarily myself but she is cool with it.

Thing is, we've been together for 13 years now, are getting married soon, and while we have agreed that if we ever met someone we clicked with, we also have come to terms with the fact it feels like that won't actually ever happen.

We're both very introverted and keep to ourselves. We aren't actually party goers, and the wildest nights we have are the extremely rare night where we host a board game night with like, maybe 4 friends. And that's a "rager" for us, comparatively.

We've looked into some dating apps but the results are... abysmal. Non starter really.

And since we are both so far along in our life together, it feels more and more like it would be impossible to "Fairly" include another person anyways. They'd forever be "second" in that me and my fiance have thirteen (and counting) years of history, whereas the new person would be starting completely fresh. That doesn't seem like it could ever work anyways, no matter how hard we tried right?

We've talked at length about this and agreed that it just doesn't seem like it could even work, despite us wanting it to, and that we're sorta just gonna have to be cool with being monogamous poly, which is weird but I dunno how else to describe it.

The only situation I've considered that would work is if it was another couple that both of us click with both of them, and everyone vibes with each other in every direction, which then means at least everyone has someone else they have history with, and someone else that is new, which feels more like now everyone is on "equal" footing if you will, removing that feeling of imbalance.

But then of course we have to confront the fact that the odds of two people finding two other people and everyone vibing with everyone else is... well incredibly low. And when I say vibing I'm talking "we want to have a close committed intimate and romantic relationship" level.

So, I guess I wanted to send out some feelers on if any other folks are in this sort of state, how are you navigating it, how do you feel about it, lets talk about this sort of state.

Something to noodle on:

Is it morally wrong to try and initiate a poly relationship with a third person, when the other 2 people have a "fallback" of each other, such that the third person forever will be subjected to the 2v1 power imbalance, that if things broke down the 2 would quick the third out, forever putting them at a disadvantage?

Cuz, personally, I feel like I can't morally subject someone to that myself, I'd forever feel "off" about putting another person (no matter how willing) into that position, it feels... wrong.

 

Im looking for some form of self hosted application, ideally dockerized(able), that can connect to and manage an existing database (Im not picky on the DB type, Postgres prolly best though).

However Id like if it manages it via a nice well designed ERD. The closest I have found so far is PgAdmin but unfortunately it's ERD leaves a lot to be desired. It's kinda clunky, and it cant "diff" against your existing database to produce a migration script, all it can do is produce a script that expects you to totally drop the existing DB and re-apply the schema from scratch.

Something like Luna/Moon would be cool, but every example I look up seems to be an application you install locally on your machine and interact with directly, as opposed to a web interface.

If you know of such a tool let me know!

 

I just downloaded the app, its loading posts just fine from lemmy.world, but where on earth do I login?

Clicking on Profile and Submit just tell me they wont work unless I am logged in. Ideally these two CTAs should instead redirect to login if you are not logged in.

I am looking all over this interface and I am either totally blind or completely unable to find the login option, is it buried somewhere or am I crazy?

Edit: Nevermind found it, top of the burger menu, I think maybe the UX of that button could be made a bit more visual, it at first glance with the icon looked like just a title.

Perhaps add a big green + symbol on it so it pops more for adding your account? The dull blue and lemmy icon aren't what I normally would associate typically with a login button, so it totally didn't pop out at me. Legit took me a solid 5+ minutes to notice it D:

 

Right now there seems to be a bit of an issue where if I want to share a link to a lemmy post with a friend, but if we call different servers our "home", even though both of our "homes" have a roughly similar copy of the same post, there currently is no easy way that I perceive for us to navigate to "our" copy of that post.

This becomes further of an issue when it comes to search engine parsing. For example I use lemmy.world as my "home" server, however when I find information on google it may link to the fedia.io or whatever "sources" link.

For reading this is no big deal.

But if I want to respond to the post, I now need to somehow figure out a way to re-route to the lemmy.world copy of that post to make my submission with my user account.

I think ideally what we need to consider is perhaps one of the following:

A: a browser plugin that can automatically detect and redirect to the matching version of the post for your server

B: OAuth support, so I can OAuth login to any lemmy server with my credentials from my "home" server via an OAuth v2 token

view more: next ›