this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14323 readers
546 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it praxis to file frivolous lawsuits against restaurant chains

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago

I don't think I'd call los tacos #1 a chain. They have like 7 locations but all in NYC all same owners, and honestly quite cheap and delicious. As a Californian who goes to New York relatively often for work I definitely approve. Also the German guy is weak their hot sauce is delicious.

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know some real nutjob commies who seem to think tying up courts is a good way to waste the resources of a tyrannical government, so who knows.


This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess it's situational. Awaiting trial isn't always better than even getting convicted. Blocking evictions or stuff like that seems like a clear W. And corporations have their private courts with binding arbitration so it doesn't necessarily effect them as much if the courts are bogged down.

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 5 points 20 hours ago

If you can waste government time and protect the working class from immediate harm, by all means, tying up shit like evictions in a courtroom is absolutely a productive use of time and energy. Using a legal system that usually punches down on the poor to do the opposite rocks when it works, and even buying time is, as you put it, a clear W.


This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.