this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14323 readers
546 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

Is it praxis to file frivolous lawsuits against restaurant chains
I don't think I'd call los tacos #1 a chain. They have like 7 locations but all in NYC all same owners, and honestly quite cheap and delicious. As a Californian who goes to New York relatively often for work I definitely approve. Also the German guy is weak their hot sauce is delicious.
I know some real nutjob commies who seem to think tying up courts is a good way to waste the resources of a tyrannical government, so who knows.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.
I guess it's situational. Awaiting trial isn't always better than even getting convicted. Blocking evictions or stuff like that seems like a clear W. And corporations have their private courts with binding arbitration so it doesn't necessarily effect them as much if the courts are bogged down.
If you can waste government time and protect the working class from immediate harm, by all means, tying up shit like evictions in a courtroom is absolutely a productive use of time and energy. Using a legal system that usually punches down on the poor to do the opposite rocks when it works, and even buying time is, as you put it, a clear W.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a bear. Please report any suspawcious behaviour.