this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
432 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

19693 readers
1536 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emi@ani.social 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't know history of uranium very much but wasn't it first used to paint ceramics and later radium for glowing watches? Uranium bombs were made later probably after it was used to generate power. But I wonder what our world would look like if there was not as much scare of nuclear power. Perhaps bit like fallouts world? We still have some time left to 23rd October 2077 thankfully.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The first man made reactor (there's an extinct naturally occurring one) was created in 1942 as part of the Manhattan project to create the first bombs. So we really did speed run the tech tree for bomb on that one. The first nuclear power plant was in 1951.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

First use: glowing paint
Second use: cancer

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

if there was not as much scare of nuclear power.

I was pro nuclear until solar became cheaper than nuclear but I think if there was less scare about nuclear, there would have been more Chernobyls. That happened because of thinking it's completely safe.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Chernobyl happened through the incompetence of leadership, not because they thought it was "completely safe".

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a good thing leadership incompetence is something that only ever happens once

And only in USSR!

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Incompetence AND overconfidence, cause those reactors were the latest generation and considered completely safe.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I'd sure hope that the latest generation of a technology would be considered safe. That's generally how things work. And then when accidents occur, we learn and make things safer the next time.

As to them considering it completely safe, I'd love to read about that if you have sources. Cause I doubt that they thought it couldn't fail.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I was pro-nuclear until Georgia Power stuck me with the bill for Plant Vogtle 3 and 4.

(Or rather, I was pro-nuclear until shortly after construction began on a 7-year plan that ultimately took 15 years, when it started to become clear that gross incompetence and corruption was going to make it an expensive debacle.)

Nuclear power from Vogtle 3 and 4 costs 16¢ per kWh (according to the linked document), by the way, compared to less than 0.1¢ per kWh expected by OP's comic.