this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
466 points (97.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38850 readers
3781 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Chiropractors are not doctors in any shape or form. There is no scientific data to backup the idea that popping random joints somehow cures illnesses. They're nothing more than snake oil salesmen who have no clue WTF they're actually doing.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Not to defend chiropractors or anything, but they legitimately have a doctorate degree and are given the title Chiropractic Physician.

Whether their studies they do in school are nonsense, they do get a degree for it. So they are technically doctors in some shape or form.

Honestly there is likely some small value in what they do, but that small value has almost definitely been absorbed into the Doctor of Osteopathy (actually medical doctor-like role), so I don't see the need for them. Definitely think physical therapists are much more beneficial.

[–] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

this is my general impression too, the origins of the practice is kinda bunk and it's probably not worth the risk for a lot of people. I particularly dislike that a lot of people will see a chiropractor for pain before they'll consider seeing a PT.

that being said, there are individual chiros out there that do good work. The main person I go to for non-chiro bodywork, who really knows her shit, sees a chiro and highly credits them for her recovery from pretty severe spinal issues.

but generally speaking there's other alternative therapies I'd recommend over seeing just any random chiro. Acupuncture can be a game changer, and is starting to become less "alternative" as some PTs offer "dry needling" now. Craniosacral work can be great for some too, it's a very gentle form of bodywork that can have a big impact nonetheless. Both of those are a lot less focused on manual adjustment, lowering the risk significantly.

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Craniosacral

"Craniosacral therapy (CST) or cranial osteopathy is a form of alternative medicine that uses gentle touch to feel non-existent rhythmic movements of the skull's bones and supposedly adjust the immovable joints of the skull to achieve a therapeutic result. CST is a pseudoscience and its practice has been characterized as quackery.[1][2] It is based on fundamental misconceptions about the anatomy and physiology of the human skull and is promoted as a cure-all for a variety of health conditions.[3][4][5]"

?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Acupuncture can be a game changer, and is starting to become less “alternative” as some PTs offer “dry needling” now.

Why would you let someone who doesn’t believe in germ theory put needles in your body?

There is no evidence justifying acupuncture.

[–] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You'll find more study in the West of "dry needling", a technique directly inspired by acupuncture. Here's one recent review.

I see an acupuncturist because the results for me are great, she's good at what she does, she does believe in germ theory, she practices in a sanitary way, and she doesn't claim to cure illnesses. These are the norms for modern licensed acupuncturists. I'm not saying every acupuncturist out there is like this, hokey grifters do exist in alt medicine spaces, and that's kind of my whole point. It really depends on the practitioner.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Many of those studies in that meta analysis show limited short term effects.

Because there is no widely accepted sham protocol for DN research, researchers should incorporate cognitive influences that extend beyond the mimicking of tactile sensations to create a believable simulation of active dry needling.

I also think there’s a serious question about what sham/placebo dry needling would be, and if inconsistent standards could impact results.

[–] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Several did show some positive short term effects, but it's no surprise that several don't. Dry needling isn't going to cure pain on its own or work for everyone, much like other forms of bodywork. Individual results vary and it needs to be done over a long period of time alongside other work to restore stability and mobility. A supplementary treatment just needs to be low-risk, accessible, and possibly beneficial enough to try. The risks associated with dry needling are less severe than those of several common PT interventions such as corticosteroid injections. To say nothing of the risks associated with chiropractic.

The lack of a standardized placebo is a problem, yes. This study had pretty good results from using a blunted needle glued in an introducer. The patient feels the sensation of the introducer being pressed against skin and "pistoned" in, but the needle doesn't actually make contact. In the group of people who had not received dry needling before, only one correctly identified that they had received the placebo.