this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
50 points (98.1% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14317 readers
646 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Were there really that many Chinese people in such poverty that childhood growth was stunted, in the 1990s?

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I believe this is more about reaching the full potential that regular complete nutrition and not living economically precariously enable I think. Pretty sure that's me and my fellow whites are (generally) so much taller than our not so distant ancestors at least.

edit: Also, the uplift of people out of poverty in the 90s was still ongoing, I'm just not confident enough to speak with authority on it. In any case I don't think it would account for the dramatic on-going line go up effect here.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago

China was still mostly rice farmers in the 1990s.