this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
434 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38757 readers
3365 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 46 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Home Depot uses Flock ALPR cameras to track you. This information is sold to advertisers, highest bidders, and is given to cops and feds for free. Source

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago

Sir, this is a shitpost

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honest question: does lowes not do it?

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, unless you've got a local mom and pop that only takes cash, you're not going to find any store where you won't get tracked.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You could however find a store that does not entertain the notion of purchasing flock AI surveillance cameras.

harm reduction.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even that is not exactly easy.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

No one said fighting fascism world be easy

I guess I boycott home depot now

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re mixing a real issue with a bunch of claims you can’t back up.

Yes, Home Depot uses Flock ALPR cameras. That part is true. They scan license plates and log vehicles in parking lots. And yes, that data can be shared with local law enforcement. That’s all documented.

But “tracking you” like some kind of live surveillance grid? Not really. It’s point-in-time plate reads. It can be aggregated into movement patterns, which is where the privacy concern actually exists, but that’s not the same thing as constant tracking.

Now the bigger problem, where are you getting that they “sell the data to advertisers or highest bidders”? There’s no credible reporting supporting that. Flock’s entire business model is selling the system and access, not dumping raw data on the open market. If you have a source, post it.

Same with “given to cops and feds for free.” It’s not that simple. Local police can access or integrate with these systems, sure. And federal agencies might get data indirectly through them. But that’s very different from Home Depot just handing it out freely to anyone with a badge.

So yeah, there’s a legitimate surveillance concern here. But when you start throwing in unsupported claims, it just weakens the argument. If you’ve got actual sources for the “advertisers” or “highest bidders” part, let’s see them. Otherwise, you’re overstating it.

What the privacy statement actually says

Where Do We Collect It From?

Directly from you or the devices you use to access digital services, such as websites, mobile applications, and applications for connected devices.

Other customers that may provide us with your information to recommend a product or service, ship products to you, or list you as a recipient of products or services.

Companies that provide services on our behalf (e.g., installers and others that may communicate with you about products or projects).

Security and fraud prevention services that help us confirm that transactions are valid and otherwise help us protect our assets and you.

Marketing companies that help us learn about our customers and the devices they use to access digital content.

Companies that supplement our customer records with additional information.

Shipping providers that update address information.

Social media platforms.

Advertising companies and content publishers that present you with our ads.

Payment and transaction processors.

Communications and mailing vendors.

The signals emitted by your mobile devices when you travel through our stores

I don't like you or what you do. I've seen your posts before, and you keep making declarative claims backed by weak sources that don't actually explain anything. On top of that, you're clearly making things up and framing it as some grand conspiracy about people being tracked.

Yes, tracking exists to a degree, but you strip out all nuance and turn it into fear-mongering. It's not useful, it's not informative, and it's not a service to anyone. Just stop.

[–] DLS@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you scroll down on the privacy and security policy, there is a section that says they record you with audio and video while you are in their stores and parking lots and provide that to advertisers, partners, subsidiaries, and law enforcement. Your reaction to the original commenter feels a little extreme.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In addition to my first comment response.

What you’re calling “extreme” is simply direct pushback without the usual padding people have come to expect. That padding, hedging, soft language, pretending both sides might have a point, is exactly why misinformation keeps spreading unchecked. It creates the illusion that facts are negotiable.

Now, if the goal is to gently reassure everyone and avoid discomfort, then yes, a softer tone would be more appropriate. But that approach routinely fails to correct anything. It prioritizes feelings over accuracy.

If the goal is to actually challenge bad information in a way that’s unambiguous and difficult to misinterpret, then a firmer tone is not only justified, it’s necessary. You don’t have to like the delivery. But dismissing it as “extreme” avoids engaging with the actual issue, whether the claim being challenged holds up. If it doesn’t, then tone becomes a secondary concern.

[–] DLS@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I find it an extremely response without ensuring what you say is correct. Context matters.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reason I responded at all was because I looked up what he was talking about because anytime someone makes a wild claim supported by a poor source it tends to raise a few red flags.

I don't mince words and I don't play it soft.

It is a clear sign of the times when clear pushback on a wild ass claim is met with "your comment is so extreme." It should be so as to ensure the validity of what I'm trying to say.

If there was more "extreme" out there my country wouldn't be the utter maga shit hole it is now.

[–] DLS@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think people reacting extremely negatively without fact checking is exactly what got our country into this state...

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Correct... 🧐

Assume nothing question authority.