this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
505 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82884 readers
4249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Fires that entrap passengers are a well-documented and recurring problem with every model in Tesla’s lineup of vehicles, but Cybertrucks appear to have a disproportionate number of known deaths. Safety experts have told the Guardian that the truck’s unique design amplifies the deadly issue. The vehicles come with high-density laminated windows that are harder to break than regular car windows, making escape and rescue difficult when doors won’t unlock. And the trucks are built with materials not commonly used in the industry, like stainless steel, which can complicate the work of emergency responders. The Cybertruck is also the first Tesla model to entirely eliminate door handles on the outside of the vehicle.

First, "unique" design? It's an ugly callback to the wedge-shaped cars of the 80s. It looks like a DeLorean model that refused to render properly, and the dev just went with it.

Second, the decision to exclude door handles is fucking mental. It's a mundane feature that cars have had since the Model T. If they wanted to make a pickup, its handles should resemble those found on a typical pickup. If it's "aesthetics" they're after (which shouldn't matter when it comes to a pickup), some of the best looking cars have had no problem including door handles into its design.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

looks like a DeLorean

Deplorean

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The reason to eliminate door handles that Tesla and others typically give is aerodynamic efficiency. Granted there are other bigger aerodynamic problems. gestures at the rest of the fucking truck

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

That's just nonsense justification they came up with after the fact. Ferraris have door handles, so clearly they're not much of an issue.

Anyway the car isn't going to exceed 80 miles an hour anyways so aerodynamics barely comes into it.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

aerodynamic efficiency

For internal door handles?

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

Everything about a Tesla interior is cost-savings masquerading as innovation. Actually most of these touch screen focused modern cars. It’s cheaper to produce than tactile buttons.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 14 hours ago

These are speed holes

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Optimized for flatulence.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought they did have internal door handles but they're hidden away. The problem is often they're difficult to get to even when the car is completely intact.

When it comes to driving a self-propelled crematorium, I'd primarily be concerned about the internal door handles.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking of the external ones which aren't default exposed

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That was always Musk bullshit. Flush mechanical handles were a thing in the 70s.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The improvement removing the handles is there, but negligible. Especially considering the safety implications. Didn't China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

Yeah, but that literally just happened last month and doesn't take effect until January 2027. It's not like they did that years ago because they saw it coming.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

Fires that entrap passengers are a well-documented and recurring problem with every model in Tesla’s lineup of vehicles

How is this a perfectly valid statement about the worlds richest man's car company without us beating him to death with hammers/ seeing how many of those baseball sized steel balls he can handle?

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

It looks like a DeLorean model that refused to render properly

Lmao

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

“Unique” here refers to the fact that every other car is built pretty much the same way in as much first responders are concerned, and that makes them predictable and fairly easy to get out of while cybertrucks are strong enough and door-handleless enough to be incredibly dangerous(while also not being strong enough to do most of what they promise).