this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
506 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82884 readers
2609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The reason to eliminate door handles that Tesla and others typically give is aerodynamic efficiency. Granted there are other bigger aerodynamic problems. gestures at the rest of the fucking truck

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

That's just nonsense justification they came up with after the fact. Ferraris have door handles, so clearly they're not much of an issue.

Anyway the car isn't going to exceed 80 miles an hour anyways so aerodynamics barely comes into it.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

aerodynamic efficiency

For internal door handles?

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Everything about a Tesla interior is cost-savings masquerading as innovation. Actually most of these touch screen focused modern cars. It’s cheaper to produce than tactile buttons.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 15 hours ago

These are speed holes

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Optimized for flatulence.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought they did have internal door handles but they're hidden away. The problem is often they're difficult to get to even when the car is completely intact.

When it comes to driving a self-propelled crematorium, I'd primarily be concerned about the internal door handles.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking of the external ones which aren't default exposed

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That was always Musk bullshit. Flush mechanical handles were a thing in the 70s.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The improvement removing the handles is there, but negligible. Especially considering the safety implications. Didn't China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Didn’t China ban flush door handles for safety reasons?

Yeah, but that literally just happened last month and doesn't take effect until January 2027. It's not like they did that years ago because they saw it coming.