this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
185 points (91.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38702 readers
5659 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I always saw blue and black, no idea how anyone could see it as white and gold unless they were colorblind tbh

[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 82 points 1 day ago (6 children)

the original photo was much more faded than the one posted here, so people's colour perception depended on how yellow/blue they perceived the photo's light to be tinted, and how bright/dark their screens were.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Wikipe-tan_wearing_The_Dress_reduced.svg/960px-Wikipe-tan_wearing_The_Dress_reduced.svg.png

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

In every configuration, every lighting condition, every monitor, every color manipulation, I see that picture as white and gold. Not once have I managed to see the blue dress, except in separate pictures of the same dress.

I understand the actual dress is blue and I understand the color theory, but even with the picture very heavily tinted blue my brain still interprets the dress to be in shadow and therefore white.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That image shows how a white and gold dress could appear to be the same color as the original picture by putting a filter of blue over it, but the original has a shop window in the bg that looks yellow/white, so for me it's hard to see it as anything but blue and black (which is the actual dress color).

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The original can be interpreted in two ways either as the dress being in too much light, which was the actual case, or as the dress being in the shadow compared to the light background - which explains the blue tint as the effect of the shadow and leads to the gold and white perception.

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

That one is easy, on the left is black and blue and on the right white and gold

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

I've seen the original one back when it was first popular, still couldn't understand the white and gold people

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I've always been able to see both colors of the dress by changing the size of the image, so the phenomenon "made sense" to me, but I legitimately have no idea how that image is supposed to explain it lol. There's two different colored dresses with seemingly random parts highlighted with different colored boxes.. are they supposed to look the same in the highlighted area or something?

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The connected boxes show that the same color appears on both sides; however, the colored boxes provide context based on the lighting which is further reenforced by the rest of the dress outside the box.

Technology Connections did a video about brown that has the same color of orange on a background that cycles between white and black and the color of orange seems to shift to brown or orange depending on the background.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Id never seen this image before but it's the clearest and most intuitive illustration of the effect I've seen.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What'a always bothered me is, the lighting in the original is so ridiculously blown out that it MUST be blue and black! It could only be white and gold under very dark lighting which is clearly not the case. Unless maybe people are thinking the front is in shadow...?

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Yep, I thought the front was in shadow, so I always saw gold and white.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I am not colourblind afaik and I could not for the life of me see it as blue and black. The lighting just made no sense for that to be the case.

It looks like the dress is in a less lit part with a very strong backlight.

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

thats because the OG** photo** (left) it is gold lace on a "white dress" (with a blue tint lighting effect etc) while IRL the dress is black & blue. right side is the edited OP photo. the difference is 'night and day' and if these all look the same i've got some news for you. ...........

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

You've got it backwards, when this happened people found the exact dress and it was blue and black, but the lighting can make it look white and gold.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I know I wa stalking about the OG photo. Though to be honest even the edited one does not look completely blue and black to me. I know the dress is blue and black in reality.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Ok this confirms my suspicion! In order for it to be white and gold you'd need to see the dress as in shadow. I always assumed it was in light because the image was lile blown out max lighting, but if you then assume that since it's backlit the dress is in shadow and there isn't significant front lighting, it could actually be white and gold. This theory has been nagging at me for YEARS and you just solved it, thank you!

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I don't think that's it. I can't perceive the original image as anything but white and gold. I tried to convince my brain about the lighting situation, but I don't think it has helped.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, something weird just happened to me... When I sent my last comment, I couldn't perceive it as anything but white and gold... Now, out of nowhere, i can't perceive it as anything but blue and black... Why? How? What just happened?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

No problem. I know the true colour but looking at the actual image I cannot force myself to see it as blue and black. It always looks white and gold even though that makes no sense if you analyse the image even slightly. It has to be in the light but my brains just refuses to see it that way.

[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Blue and gold maybe, but white and gold doesn't even make sense to me. For a white dress to look blue it needs to be under blue light, which would cause the gold highlights to be dark with a blue sheen. The missing blue sheen indicates that either it's gold under natural lighting or black under yellowish lighting.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Crazy, its almost as if color perception is individual and dependent on lighting and surroundings. Obviously only your perception of reality is the "real" one.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

I'm mildly colorblind and it's just too dark for me to make out. It could be white, blue, etc. But the black part doesn't look solid enough to be black either. I just think the camera failed to properly get a read at that lighting level .

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is what I am seeing now too, same as the first time I saw this.

However, when it got posted to Lemmy ~7months ago I could switch it between colours.

I posted then, about how to do it. Something like defocussing your eyes, and then looking at the sunny part on the right-side, to switch to white&gold.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In 11 years, I'm still unable to see white and gold

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Turns out this is a fine shitpost.

Posting a saturated picture that is only a black and blue dress, rather than the orig picture.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

That’s the one I’m talking about