this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
813 points (99.3% liked)

Climate

8395 readers
1115 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

If the post is even accurate, that likely doesn't factor in secondary needs. Roads, tires, shampoo, soap, lubricants, hydrogen, solvents, medical plastics. So many things made from oil and oil byproducts.

All of these industries have to be looking into alternatives in parallel, if they are even aware.

not to mention the big one, fertilizers

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

All of these industries have to be looking into alternatives in parallel, if they are even aware.

Why?

I mean, I think it would be good, but why would they have to be looking into alternatives? Why couldn't we phase out fossil fuels for burning purposes, and then whenever that's done start thinking about phasing them out for use in other products?

[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

Plastics are a waste product of converting oil to useful fuels. That's why they're so cheap and used in the most unbelievably wasteful ways. They'll remain inextricably linked. Fuel is expensive, plastics are incredibly cheap. If we ban the use of fossil fuels but still rely on oil based plastics, plastics will become very expensive and we'll still be creating the fuel. We'll just have a growing supply of worthless energy sitting around and decaying in storage.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea as I'm not an expert by any means, but to keep plastics for essential uses like in medicine will likely require a heavily subsidized plastic industry at least. But hey we already subsidize the fossil fuel industry directly and by externalizing the planet destroying effects of their use...

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Those all can be produced from synthetic hydrocarbons made from atmospherically captured CO2. We don't need to drill an oil well to make plastic.

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Whoa, seriously? Okay that's awesome to know. And pretty cool.

-- Frost

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Asphalt for pavement and shingles is amaong the most recycled materials on the planet.

Soap and shampoo can be made from animal fat or vegetable oil.

Hydrogen can be made from water. You get oxygen too.

These are not unsolveable problems.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

They're not problems that need to be solved. If we cut fossil fuel use by 90%, there's hardly any impact on these uses.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 hours ago

Never said unsolvable by any means, but they need to be solved yesterday. Blows the mind too, for all those capitalism-minded people, they have all this untapped "wealth" they could be getting into on the ground floor instead of clinging to oil.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Asphalt for pavement and shingles is amaong the most recycled materials on the planet.

Not how you think. The asphalt is ground up for the mineral content then mixed with new bitumen.

Soap and shampoo can be made from animal fat or vegetable oil.

Most of it is. Cheapest way to do it.

Hydrogen can be made from water. You get oxygen too.

By wasting a lot of electricity.

[–] UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Hydrogen can be made from water. You get oxygen too.

By wasting a lot of electricity.

Just curious, how is the majority of hydrogen produced/mined/farmed now?

I kinda always assumed it was electrolysis just because the process is so simple.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 2 points 2 hours ago

Most hydrogen is currently produced from methane, meaning natural gas. It's a huge source of carbon dioxide.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

shampoo, soap

We could reduce shipping needed for these if it became the norm to ship them dry and mix with water in the home. Bonus: they could be shipped in paper rather than plastic, and consumed from reusable glass bottles rather than plastic.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

1000% this. I've been trying to get my household switched over to dry detergents whenever possible. I simply hate the idea of shipping water around, since it is bulky, heavy, and makes up like 70-90% of most household cleaners.

[–] bobzer@lemmy.zip 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

I agree, but the problem is how dangerous many of the chemicals are in dry concentrations.

People already mix household bleach with acidic cleaners. Imagine if they had dry sodium hypochlorite sitting around.

Bleach dispensers at the supermarket or pharmacy sound pretty dystopian but maybe shipping the concentrate and mixing at the PoS is safer.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 24 minutes ago

Fwiw this idea does exist. Here's one site that sells it. That site has handwash, general household cleaner, dishwashing powder & tablets, etc., as well as glass bottles to use them in. Also something called "bleach alternative". All designed to be shipped dry.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

And set up a bottle deposit and return system that only needs to function at a local level. Haha, the solution to one of the big problems I saw with using glass instead of plastics for packaging. Just don't ship it that way, ship it at scale dry in a paper container that collapses to nothing for the return trip, or holds some other good going back.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Petrochemicals are barely 10% of oil usage, not really important by volume.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It was literally the byproduct of fuel production. They had to find uses for it and created the petrochemical revolution.

The issue was we already had ways of making all our products without petroleum byproducts. They also didn't cause cancer which is kind of nice.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The vast majority of oil and gas consumption is just burning the shit in a pile

The oil companies want you to think about plastics to make you think all the oil we drill is important, but it's actually only a tiny fraction. It's all propaganda.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago

There is indeed propaganda going on, but there is also a reality that many supply chains need conversion, and that money needs to come from somewhere. Not saying it is right, nor that it is unsolvable, just a reality. Most often, the smaller businesses are destroyed by expensive switches to new methods. Which is all we need, more megacorps owning everything.

In a world with functioning governments, processes, grants, tax breaks, and such could be set up to help companies switch.

[–] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

You forgot normal plastics. 99.99% of all plastic types are basically made from petroleum.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They don't have to be though. We do not need petroleum to make plastics.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, didn't want to hit every note. Medical specifically requires a higher tolerance and quality level that makes it more challenging to be replaced with alternatives like bioplastics. For most items, I'd be fine buying them in glass or cans again.