this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
139 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14285 readers
628 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If all porn is like this and all porn watchers are watching it, it ceases to be worth much blackmail value so in this case I don't think so. That's why they want real ID laws attached to porn viewing so they can find the actually abnormal or non-average stuff people seek out and try and use it and people's shame about it to blackmail them.
No one would give a shit about someone being revealed to have watched (fake) incest porn 5 years from now and even trying to slander them as watching incest porn would have a good amount of people questioning whether it wasn't just the fake kind. It's the fact your hypothetical blackmailee has a foot fetish and an interest in heavy bondage that will be used to paint them as a wacko. Not this. Many people have a non-mainstream interest. Failing that, eventually they will have clicked on something they don't even enjoy just by chance and that can be used to insinuate things about them.