294
The greatest risk of AI in higher education isn’t cheating – it’s the erosion of learning itself
(theconversation.com)
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Universities are for systems of practice, they are not information factories.
I like that so much.
Yeah, it's a really eloquent way of phrasing it.
It's something I've been thinking about a lot lately, because I have a lot of friends who are doing PhDs at the moment. It's interesting because especially at this stage, their actual research output isn't the point. Like, ofc publishing your research is a key part of the process of getting a PhD, but that's almost like an incidental byproduct of the process — the actual primary product is a person who is knowledgeable and experienced enough in the academic process that they can be trusted to be a part of the system.
(Tangentially, something I've been pondering lately is that I think Wikipedia works similarly, in that the encyclopedia itself isn't the point, but rather the robust systems of editor organising and social infrastructure is the "real" product of value, and the encyclopedia is just a byproduct that exists downstream of the system of practice)