this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
266 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

19160 readers
1267 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ftbd@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If you dislike R, give Julia a try!

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have a good friend like you. Smart guy, talks about R but mostly about Julia.

We haven't spoken in years

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

They're adjacent

[–] marius@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the advantage of either of them compared to a jupyter notebook?

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jupyter notebook isn't a language, it's a tool for running interactive sessions, typically with Python, but in principle with any language. I'm fairly certain people run Julia in Jupyter Notebooks.

As for the advantages of Julia versus Python, arrays are native types, so they interface better across the entire language. It's also shockingly fast in comparison, it compiles the code at runtime, so the longer the program runs, the faster it is.

If there is a use-case for R that Julia or Python can't do, I haven't seen it. I personally don't see the point of writing code in R when the Python and Julia are more broadly useful to learn.

[–] JstAnthrUsr@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Actually I like it Its fun if it works ;P

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

unfortunately, julia has been adding "agentic code" to their codebase for a while now.

[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Developer here, I seriously don't know what to think of the modern tech in general. I reject LLMs because they're not trustworthy so all of my searches are your typical search engine, stackoverflow, etc. The internet feels so empty, you'd rarely find anything from the last couple of years that's not AI-gen.

This is making believe that we will reach a point when our tech stack docs are only cooked into LLMs and I fucking hate that. I would rather go back to the 1990s over this.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago

The problem is it's an arms race! Stop treating LLMs like their existence is the problem and start viewing it via the lens of war:

The enemy has lots of badly-behaving LLMs! Marketers, scammers, and lazy management are equipped with Big AI brand LLMzookas that are sending hallucinations our way!

Captain: "So what do we do about it?"

Soldier: "Captain, there's FOSS LLMs that we can deploy! We can use them to defeat the enemy's bullshit slingers! They can be used to search the web on our behalf to filter out hallucinations and advertisements disguised as content! We can set them up to monitor enemy deployments and analyze intelligence to find the truth and stop propaganda in its tracks!"

Captain: "...but can FOSS AI generate boobs‽"

Soldier: "Sir, FOSS has already surpassed commercial AI in that front of the war."

Captain: "We need to deploy FOSS AI ASAP!"