this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
597 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

19113 readers
1591 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe that he was probably a sexual person in some form and he probably had money so maybe he might have paid for sex. But I have no idea really.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe in his earlier life. He was married more than once and had three children.

His name does appear in the Epstein files, but he was never actually accused of anything related to Epstein. To say that Hawking was a pedophile is speculation at best.

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So about the same situation as Chomsky then?

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 1 points 13 minutes ago

Pretty much, yeah. Chomsky was friends with Epstein, but friendship doesn't automatically equate to criminality. As far as i'm aware, there is currently no evidence against him.

It might seem unfair, but that's how the law works.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Another factor here is that Epstein was obsessed with physics and being friends with physicists.

While Epstein was always a monster. He could hide it around certain people.

But from everything I've read, the monster always comes out. And we all know what being Epstein's friend eventually entails.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That's pure speculation. Your argument is what is referred to as "guilt by association". Your argument has no basis. It wouldn't hold up in court.

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

These people don't care. I got downvoted to hell by saying the same thing. Apparently faktual evidence isn't the norm in here.

[–] Azrael@reddthat.com 3 points 18 hours ago

You're probably right. A story is more important than facts to them.