Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
News story from 2015:
The letter was issued by the Future of Life Institute which is now Max Tegmark and Toby Walsh's organization.
People have worked on the general pop culture that inspired TESCREAL, and on the current hype, but less on earlier attempts to present machine minds as a clear and present danger. This has the 'arms race' narrative, the 'research ban' proposed solution, but focuses on smaller dangers.
Oh hey. I remember this. I was confused at the time how it seemed to almost come out of left field, and how some of the names ended up on the same letter.
Now I recognise all those names from the Epstein files, although some were only mentions rather than direct participants.
lmao the shade
If you follow world politics, it has been obvious that Noam Chomsky is a useful idiot since the 1990s and probably the 1970s. I wish he had learned from the Khmer Rouge that not everyone who the NYT says is a bad guy is a good guy!
Oh absolutely. It's frankly shocking how wrong he's been about so many things for so so long. He's also managed to pen the most astonishingly holocaust-denial-coded diatribe I've ever read from (ostensibly) a non-holocaust denier. I guess his overdeveloped genocide-denial muscle was twitching!
The point about heavy artillery is actually pretty salient, though a more thorough examination would also note that "Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems" is a category that includes goddamn land mines. Of course this would serve to ground the discussion in reality and is thus far less interesting to people who start organizations like the Future of Life Institute.
I'm pretty sure LAWS exist right now, even without counting landmines. Automatic human targeting and friend/foe distinction aren't exactly cutting edge technologies.
The biggest joke to me is that these systems are somewhat cost-efficient on the scale of a Kalashnikov. Ukraine is investing heavily into all kinds of drones, but that is because they're trying to be casualty-efficient. And it's all operator based. No-one wants the 2M€ treaded land-drone to randomly open fire on a barn and expose its position to a circling 5k€ kamikaze drone.