this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
878 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

18076 readers
1184 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wouldn't the constant stream of new gold tank the market value?

[–] 5190tent@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look at the gold price for the last 10 years, it's steadily rising. We keep producing more electronics that need gold. At the same time some gold is lost because not in all tech it can be easily recycled. On top of that gold mining is becoming more expensive because a lot of easily accessible gold has been mined out.

So even if this technology could create additional gold in the future it probably won't out scale the growing demand.

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

Tbf gold demand is artifical, total mined gold by humanity is approx 27m³, used in electronics is 1m³, rest is jewelry and storage. Value of gold essentially boils down to "it has value and is pretty"

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

global mine production is 10t per day. 120t/day from single 1gw e plant does sink value substantially, but is a drop in the bucket compared to 80k tons of copper/day. Gold is a better copper I think, so maybe a floor value of $20/kg. But to subsidize fusion energy by 20c/kwh, it needs to stay above $11/oz . Gold is also a better silver, but silver production is 80t/day, and so gold is unlikely to hold that threshhold value.

A bigger deal is that we are collectively too politically stupid to have "golden goose fusion". Our blessed oligarchs deserve better than their heathen oligarchs, and it is perfectly normal to diminish and warcruise them. Nuclear power already isn't war resilient, and destroying one is something Ukraine has seen propaganda value in doing due to media control that would blame Russia for it. So, our collective stupidity is already at extreme levels. But the play in golden goose fusion is buy all the ultra cheap gold after mine closures, and then destroy all the golden geese. Destroy all attempts to build new ones.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not really familiar with the proposed scale of fusion plants, but how do you get to 120t/day? The paper says the theoretical gold output is 2t/GWth/year.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

then I am way off. I read off blury thumbnai, GWh-thermal. Your version makes it negligeable gold production.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

I can't imagine it would be any different than a new gold mine opening up somewhere in the world.