this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
102 points (97.2% liked)

movies

3521 readers
365 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well you’ve got to really. The real story of robbing the poor to line the pockets of the rich doesn’t have the same ring to it.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Real story? He's a fictional character.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

He’s a character from folklore which is a bit different. He isn’t owned by any one author. He may be based on historical people with certain details embellished or altered, and then more fictional stories added on over time.

His stories do include references to real historical people and events, such as the kings Richard I and John. The 1938 film (starring Errol Flynn) weaves these two into a story about Robin Hood leading a peasant revolt against John, tapping into Anglo-Saxon identity as a form of English nationalism.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I’m pretty sure they’re saying that this fictional story about a fictional character is necessary be because the true story would be about Bezos and people would hate it.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 4 months ago

He's nearly as real as Jesus

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He's a fictional character.

Sorta? He's a folk legend, which are often based in reality but highly exaggerated (more and more over time). So mostly yes, but probably at least partially no

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The Disney Robin Hood movie fucking rips. Everything afterwards sucks.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Men In Tights was good for it's time!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Prince of Thieves with Kevin Costner was also good.

The best Robin Hood film is the one from 1938 starring Errol Flynn. That movie is a masterpiece!

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Man Alan Rickman and Michael Wincott playing off each other was just incredible!

Wincott

Why a spoon cousin? Why not an axe or a sword?

Rickman

Because it will hurt more you idiot!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yes! Alan Rickman was a true scene stealer in everything he did. I really miss him! RIP

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Hell yeah. Good call.

[–] christopher@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

My favorite Robin Hood!

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago