this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8548 readers
52 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
On this matter, I occasionally break people's brains when they argue that words like "unalived" are literally 1984 because it's actually the polar opposite of Orwell's (admittedly pretty shitty) thesis with Newspeak.
Here's the summary of the Newspeak position:
The government controls language and removes words and, thus, removes the concept from our collective experience by making it impossible for us to engage with it or describe it.
Here's the summary of neologisms like "unalive":
The structure of social media prevents/discourages discussions of suicide and so, in response to censorship, people maintain their concept of it and they resort to inventing new words to communicate the same idea to subvert attempts at preventing discussion of these topics.
You see what's going on there, right?
Newspeak is the erasure of concepts by eliminating words. Social media neologisms are the response to censorship and the effort to work around it while maintaining the shared understanding of the concept through making more words for the concept, which is the exact opposite of removing words for a concept until (allegedly, according to Orwell's dubious position) the concept itself gets erased. So if you're concerned about a 1984 reality where words are removed and concepts are erased then you should actually be celebrating social media neologisms rather than denouncing them.
...but apparently nobody engages their literacy when it comes to reading 1984.
Right at the beginning of the book, it says most of the surveillance state is pointed at government employees and that it doesn't matter too much what the average workers say and think. But for some reason, nobody responds well when I remind them of that.
Yeah 1984's assessment of the average worker is basically that they are meat robots who have no effect on the world and that it doesn't matter what they do or think because nobody does or should give them or their affairs the slightest thought
Orwell was a "socialist" though
Bri*ish socialism has always been deeply aristocratic at its core and Orwell can't help but exemplify that colonial cop mentality in his writing
His interview with Stalin is hilarious, and it's very interesting to see Stalin calmly explain himself to a dunce.
Agreed.
Full transcription of the interview here.
Audio narration from Socialism For All here.
goddamit, yet another tally in the "modern US is where Britain was a century ago" column
hot damn Stalin really has a firmer grasp on English history than the englishman
"The material conditions are such that the treatlerite strata of society is demanding more treats because their treat allocation has been somewhat reduced.
Therefore a materialist analysis of the political situation is uncalled for given that these people are demanding more treats. Also I got invited to the king's court to speak to him, which further proves my point somehow. The only conclusion that can be gleaned from this is that class conflict, which is based on material conditions, can be abandoned as it is deprecated by the current material conditions and it is trumped by the centrality of idealism."
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
The same guy who refers to the working class as sheep in animal farm.
Oh that's interesting. I'm gonna use that next time.
I read 1984 when I was young so it's been a long time and I never really got into it so it didn't leave a big enough impression on me that I could recall more than the broad brush strokes so this is handy info to have at my disposal.
At the risk of coming off as stuffy, I'm not a big fan of the internet neologisms because they're kinda cringey and we already have so many good euphemisms that we could use instead. (I guess it says something about literacy when the discourse demands a single word replacement which is prosaic instead of using something that has a little bit of metaphorical flair to it.) It always baffles me that someone who is mildly opposed to those neologisms, who refuses to use them, and who also is a very vocal critic of Orwell that takes any opportunity to shit on him ends up being the #1 defender of Orwell's work and of internet neologisms.
I really don't want to be in that position lol
Honestly... I never finished it. Made it through the first coupla chapters for a high school class, and I bullshitted my way through the rest of the group discussion. From what I gathered, I had read more of it than most of the other students.
I did finish it but it was a hell of a grind and there was nothing notable about the final act that it left any impression on me so I doubt you missed out on anything.
1984 really felt like Orwell had a hot idea for a dystopia so he wrote the world and then... idk that was about it. The End.
It's worse, he really hated the Soviet Union and used any tiny excuse or premise he could invent as an opportunity to "criticize" it, including during WW2 (notably, he did not do this to the fascists of the time). You can tell because he truly tortures the plot and setting of 1984 to make sure you couldn't possibly mistake the antagonists for fascists or any other ideology than his warped view of the USSR. If you haven't read the Isaac Asimov review of 1984, it's worth reading. He makes this point a lot better than I could.
The review you mentioned, in case anyone wants to read it.
I know that everyone here is probably already aware of this but, on the odd chance that someone isn't already, did you know that Orwell not only straight up plagiarised the concept for the story of Animal Farm but he also decided that, instead of the story being an anti-nazi, it would be better if it was an anti-Soviet parable instead?
Very likely. It's not actually a very good book.
I find it so weird how people don't just use sayings, like "punched his own ticket" or "caught the bus" or something new, and instead make a coinage that is comically crass in its grasp on language (De-alived would be more appropriate, for example).
I'm really partial to "clocking out early" but I'm totally with you on this.
I haven't looked into this but my hunch is that since it's very online terminology that it's probably an adaptation of unsubscribe, hence the un- prefix.
yeah you need to know what the elided terms are in order to use the new one. reminds me of findings that txt spk actually improves spelling because you have to be thinking about how the words are spelled all the time.
That's a great way to fail your year 8 English lit. class.