this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
1735 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

20039 readers
2451 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (15 children)

If we want children to learn these things, we should teach them these things directly, instead of relying on science classes. I'm not saying we should get rid of science classes, but the people who are saying these stupid things did actually take science classes in school.

We desperately need to teach classes that are specific. I learned a lot about problem solving from math classes, but I was shocked when I tutored other kids, and they only learned the math, but had no idea how to approach problems. And I don't mean just word problems, but literally even if you just give them multiple equations and variables.

My tutoring often went like this: "I can't solve this!" "What information to they give you? What answer do they want? What can you do with the stuff that they've given you to get the answer?" And then they get the answer. Then repeat. Literally no math involved in the tutoring for math class.

So, we need required classes, early, like in elementary school, that specifically teach problem solving, critical thinking, how to detect misinformation, and what I'll call empathy. By "empathy", I mean the ability to imagine yourself in another person's shoes so that you can predict why they're doing what they're doing. It's essential for detecting misinformation because you need to trust somebody at some point, so you need to understand how to tell who is more likely to be trustworthy. I also think we should teach children meditation techniques.

[–] Daryl76679@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago (9 children)

But how do you teach those skills directly

[–] protist@mander.xyz 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but what are electrolytes?

[–] TaterTot@piefed.social 7 points 4 months ago

What plants crave...

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 months ago

Science classes

And [other^1^] philosophy, especially epistemology.

... And it's quite telling and daunting that

But how do you teach those skills directly

was asked.

Like it was missing the question mark because it was rhetorical. Like it's beyond their conception, and as if in absence of evidence (or experience) it's presumed to be evidence of absence of possibility or means to do so.

Looking forward to this year, and more people realising more of how much has been stolen from us.

[ ^1^ Because science is just another branch of philosophy. Natural philosophy. ]

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)