this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
124 points (99.2% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14230 readers
622 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I've seen this writer for a while so I don't know if it's AI written but it reads so much like it is it's incredibly distracting, I feel like I'm losing my mind these days doubting whether or not things are AI generated. I guess it doesn't really matter but this writing style makes me feel nauseous lately.

That’s the core fact that matters: this wasn’t just possession—it was a tool.

That is not how “just a rich pervert” moves. That is how an international criminal or intelligence asset moves.

Because this isn’t just about a passport. It’s about a pattern.

It tells you the concealment wasn’t a late adaptation. It was early architecture.

It is not the end of the story. It is the beginning of a more honest story.

Anyway though I wouldn't doubt he was connected to Mossad/MI6 or another agency, or a go-between for multiple agencies and other wealthy elite.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The writer is Shaun King. A well-known scammer and grifter. I don't know why he's being linked to at Hexbear.

Controversies

  • Deleted false sexual assault accusation against Texas state trooper
  • Jazmine Barnes shooting
  • Fundraising activities and disputes
  • Deleted Twitter post on depictions of Jesus
  • Grassroots Law Project
  • Claimed involvement in release of Israeli hostages by Hamas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_King#Controversies

[–] Kopfrkingl@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good god. I didn't know. I linked it because that is where I first saw the pics; it doesn't have anything of substance otherwise. I've replaced it with an archive of the justice.gov pdf which includes even more pictures.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The writer is Shaun King. A well-known scammer and grifter. I don't know why he's being linked to at Hexbear.

Because for every person that knows Shaun King is a grifter, there's a 1,000 others that do not.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Hexbears are linking to Yotube vids with AI and Substacks by horrible people. I don't think it's much to ask that this little corner of the internet be at least a wee bit better than Reddit. And what that requires is effort by the posters not to link to such stuff.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talcum_X

(slang, humorous, derogatory) Shaun King.

Synonyms: Hueless P. Newton, Martin Luther Cream, Thurgood Partial

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 20 points 2 weeks ago

Emdash plus "not just X, but Y"

yeahhh

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

it's incredibly distracting, I feel like I'm losing my mind these days doubting whether or not things are AI generated.

I've had that feeling from Youtube vids posted at Hexbear. I started going into the comments first to see what people had to say. I don't watch that many Youtube vids via Hexbear but in just the last few days I ended up at 3 vids with AI narration. It's very disappointing. I expect more from this site. The most recent vid was trivia about a very silly 1970s comedy movie called "The Big Bus". The voice even had the wonky "p" sound that results from people not quite mic'ing themselves correctly.

After about 4 minutes I had had enough. The narration was like milk that seemed okay but left a spoiled aftertaste. And as time goes on and AI starts to make more and more of stuff we'll end up questioning everything. How many facts are fake? How much text is fake? How many of the images are fake? Of course right now on the fly AI can't generate fake 1970s-like movie footage. I knew "The Big Bus" footage was real. But years from now AI surely be able to make up all sorts of seemingly real nonsense after the "creator" types a bit and pushes some buttons.

AI could make up something seemingly real like the "The Huge Plane" an entirely fake 1970s comedy with fake details like "starring Burt Reynolds" and then show Reynolds in some scenes.

[–] Kopfrkingl@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't know if it's AI written but I found it rather repetitive.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's so obviously AI it hurts. Real people very rarely use "It's not x, it's y" sentence construction. AI fucking spams that shit.

It's either AI or it's someone who has read so much AI slop that they have basically turned their brain into ChatGPT

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think it's that rare for people to use that sentence structure, but it's insane just how frequently AI uses it. I have to wonder if it's another case of AI inbreeding at this point.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

It does have the hallmarks of AI text or someone who spends most of their time writing clapbacks on social media, which you know, one learned from the other.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

Either way it's a lot of filler.