this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
271 points (94.4% liked)

Science Memes

17702 readers
1119 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ns1@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Whilst I've heard this idea said plenty of times by scientists as a way of demystifying the double slit and similar experiments, it doesn't really do justice to the weirdness of the quantum world.

Firstly in the "default" interpretation there's no mechanism or explanation for how an observation causes wavefunction collapse, it's just a rule that it just does that. And the collapse doesn't correspond to a change in momentum of a particle or any other change in classical physical state, but something else entirely.

In the double slit experiment a detector at one slit somehow seems to affect the particle as it leaves the source, before it reaches the detector (so the effect is backwards in time!) And without the detector it goes through both slits at once.

[โ€“] Xenny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

......sounds like an optimization technique to me