this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
300 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

9873 readers
3419 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's the setting to disable on smart TVs for a better image. The option can do oone or more of the following: adds in-between frames, reduces noise, and upscales video. Sounds good, but the implementation is always terrible.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is this what that uncanny "too smooth" look is on my parents TV? Whenever I'd go to visit them whatever they had on always looked like the camera motion or character movement was way too smooth to the point it was kind of unsettling.

[–] ultrafastsloth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The “soap opera” effect. Filmmakers hate this

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Animators too. FFS, when you deliberately position a character to look fluid, life-like, and emphatic at a frame rate, you have to respect it, or you lose it! Adding frames willy-nilly ruins movies and animation. Don't like it? Wanna be a gamer? Well, maybe just sit tight and accept that you have to trust that the artist, idfk, knew how to do their fucking job.

Personal rant here. I hate automated interpolation. I would literally prefer it if you deep-fried my work by overcompressing it over and over to 'save space.'

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It brings you gorgeous frames like this:

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Aqua just looks like that.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

that's just Aqua

[–] brb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Looks like the usual Aqua to me

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've been exposed to a smart TV only once in my life, and I hated the experience so much 😅

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is that possible in 2025?

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My 55 inch rca has been going strong for a decade and it's just monitors other than that

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe they were born yesterday?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I usually hate those too...

But they are not universally bad. OLED screens have almost instantaneous response times, which if paired with lateral movement and content shot at 24 FPS can become a stuttery mess instead of a smooth camera pan. In some movies, it's enough to give me a headache.

In those scenarios, one of the interpolation settings available on my LG C1 instantly fixes the issue and does not add significant artifacts. The goal isn't simulating 120 FPS on a TV show, but working around content filmed at abysmally low FPS (which was relevant when film was expensive and we used blurry TVs, not good for 2025).

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Black frame insertion?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I'm enjoying LG's implementation. 🤷‍♂️ I have that stuff enabled, but not on the outputs where I play games.