this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
540 points (98.7% liked)
Fuck AI
4629 readers
1952 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Woops you don't realize I have worked in a couple colleges over the past 10 years, and also have friends who work in other colleges, and have seen how professors are pressured/forced to pass students who shouldn't. But it's not part of some "woke" shit, it's because the college doesn't want to lose a paying customer, and it also makes their numbers look better to recruit future students. I'm surprised, but happy, to see not all colleges are going this path because it really is some slimy shit.
What did you do at those universities (and were they notably accredited)? There's a world of options here, and the difference in areas of budgetary interest between being something like a provost vs. a lab manager is vast. Both deal with budgets, but the familiarity with the broad scope of the uni's budgetary policy vs. the realities of budgetary specifics is very relevant to the impression you present here.
For example, a reputation for enforcing academic rigour greatly improves things like grant allocation, which cover far more of a university's budget than a small percentage loss of tuition from academic dismissal of students does. That is not an aspect addressed directly below the level of deans (or program leads at larger unis, and PIs at research-heavy ones) but one that has a tremendous impact on the daily operation of the institution.
It's just not an either/or issue here, and in general academic dismissal is a net zero for a university because of those huge areas of unstated complexity.