Chapotraphouse

14178 readers

981 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

What’s the stance on fake borger? (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago by Lussy@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Talking about impossible and beyond meat, of course. I like their taste, so I’m not one of those burger fash who complains about not being able to taste the flesh wounds of their victims. Just need the skinny on how it compares in terms of it’s nutrient quality, health factors in terms of contaminants in production or as a result of (PFAS, lead), and the impact on the environment. I’m sure the production of fake borg is better than maintaining and slaughtering cows, but relative to other foods how much better is it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Dinner tonight was vegan bacon cheeseburgers with lightlife bacon and impossible burgers and they tasted pretty good.

I don't prefer making (faux)meat-forward meals but I do occasionally and I don't look down on them. I don't think the meat substitutes are that unhealthy (almost certainly healthier than what they're replacing) but they're expensive and I genuinely enjoy cooking with veggies, beans, tofu, etc. more than just a burger or whatever. I never liked the concept of a chunk of meat being the centerpiece with some sides or vegetables scattered throughout when most food has so much potential flavor. I love that veganism really challenges that dynamic, forcing the chef to create meals that integrate ingredients rather than isolate them.