this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23579 readers
85 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There hasn't been any new news since around May. But that hasn't stopped Imdb from churning out "articles" that are merely copy-and-pastes from many months old info like the article I posted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Too bad he hasn't made a good feature-length movie since District 9

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I thought Chappie was fun kitty-cri and Elysium is well, eh, it's okay I guess, agree it's not near D9 levels.

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

For me Elysium was sooo full of plot holes and garbage shaky camera action sequences that couldn't be visually parsed, that I gave up on him as a director. Absolute rubbish. 2/10

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's like he forgot that the shaky cam enhanced District 9 because it's literally filmed like a documentary of events by an unprepared film crew making do with what they have. Meanwhile Elysium is not shot with the kind of style and just feels bad by doing that. If you're going to use that kind of camera work you need to ground the audience in feeling like it's appropriate.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is it around that time when every movie had tons of shaky cam because of the Bourne movies?

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

District 9 was 2009 so yeah there'd been 3 Bourne movies beforehand. But in District 9 it didn't matter because the camera work enhanced the tone of the movie as a documentary of events that transpired.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Ya District 9 was great. I never got around to seeing Elysium, though.

[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

I wanted to like Chappie, but between Die Antwoord, Hugh Jackman's character and the wealth of unexplored ideas, it felt like a massive missed opportunity.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Chappie was a steaming pile of dogshit.. Jesus.

[–] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's fine for people to like things jfc

[–] Spike@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

This is an odd comment to be made on a thread about a potentially pro fascist movie being made

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That movie was fucking terrible on every level…

[–] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

And?

Let me know what things you like so I can call them steaming piles of dogshit as well.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I like steaming piles of dogshit

[–] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

You like steaming piles of dogshit

nelsonhaha.jpg

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's fine. They're being rude and couching it in an opinion about a movie.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pretty much, let them be an ass I guess.

[–] musicpostingonly@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

Yeah. Not worth it.