this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
423 points (99.1% liked)

News

37153 readers
1678 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump announced Friday that he was scrapping U.S. tariffs on beef, coffee, tropical fruits and a broad swath of other commodities — a dramatic move that comes amid mounting pressure on his administration to better combat high consumer prices. 

Trump has built his second term around imposing steep levies on goods imported into the U.S. in hopes of encouraging domestic production and lifting the U.S. economy. His abrupt retreat from his signature tariff policy on so many staples key to the American diet is significant, and it comes after voters in off-year elections this month cited economic concerns as their top issue, resulting in big wins for Democrats in Virginia, New Jersey and other key races around the country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 63 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I mean, let's just sit back and observe the stupidly obvious fact that Trump is lowering tariffs to lower grocery store prices, which necessarily confirms Trump knows that creating tariffs raised the grocery store prices, despite that he has said the exact opposite.

So tell me, mainstream media: Did we do it? Did we catch Trump in a lie so logically incontestable that your reporters would feel empowered to finally report it as a "lie"?

[Scans article]

...sigh.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Joke is on American customers. I bet my ass that prices either won't fall at all, or at least fall far less than the change of tariffs would warrant.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

Of course they won’t. Prices never go back down. We’re still paying extra for the ongoing COVID supply chain troubles.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They can't say 'lie.' It's one of the few words you can basically never use as a journalist.

It's not about the incontestability of the truth. It's about the fact that a 'lie' (as opposed to a 'falsehood') requires intent. Basically, unless you have psychic powers, or a written, signed declaration from the person saying "Yes, I intentionally lied," you can't prove it's a lie. And in journalism, you do have to be able to prove the things you say. Potentially in a court of law.

He could just be stupid. He could just be ignorant. He could just be suffering from serious mental decline. We don't know for sure.

I get that's not a satisfying answer. We all know, intuitively, that Trump lies, constantly and endlessly. He tells himself ten lies in the morning just to get out of bed. I get it. We all know it. But journalism has to be held to a higher standard, and that standard has to be applied consistently, not just when it suits us.

Yes, all well and good, and upvoted for the rational response of course.

I understand there are standards. But the enemy of the good is the perfect, and if journalistic standards require perfect evidence and won't otherwise represent the best-fit explanation, then they are easily exploited by bad actors like Trump who will intentionally withhold perfect evidence. The public good is served by reporting from a reasonable person's perspective what the most likely explanation is, including the terminology that goes with it. Here, that is a "lie."

I'd also argue their concern in this case isn't standards, but legal liability for defamation. At least from a legal perspective, reporters and publications have clear defenses at this point to saying "lie" since regardless of subjective momentary intent, the preponderance of people / jurors should accept contextual evidence of intent like his prior statements.

And even journalistic standards should be addressable by calling it something like an "apparent" lie to allow the possibility of other explanations, while still calling it what it almost certainly is.

[–] username123@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

I see the logic, but it's still just excuses. The intensity of words matter to be accurate or to water down. Currently they are watering down. Saying it's to keep integrity while the country falls apart and also while being caught with more flagrant absences of integrity is just hypocritical theatrics and people are right to judge them for that.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

I don't think he was lying. I think he's a fucking idiot who refuses to listen to anyone else and it has taken this long for someone to drill the truth into his stupid fucking head.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Will it actually bring down the prices or will corps keep the prices and just make a bigger profit?

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 5 months ago

Smartest thing Il Duche has done this term:

Undo a little of the stupid shit he did earlier in the term