this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
649 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

17325 readers
2263 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Er... every system of measurement is accurate, tautologically.

0°F = 0°F because 0°F = 0°F, by definition.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Only Kelvin is valid thermodynamically because thermodynamics often needs absolute temperature for the math to work out right. Rankine is only for masochistic idiots who like fucking up their math and having extra stupid constants all over the place to compensate for their shitty unit system.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 13 hours ago

Perhaps, but that was not the statement. The statement was:

Kelvin is objectively the most accurate.

Functionally, a measurement system cannot be inaccurate. You might define a new temperature measurement in blargs, and define that the room you're in right now is 1 blarg. It is now an accurate statement to say that the room is 1 blarg. At the time of measurement, it is not possible for that statement to be inaccurate.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I dunno. I wouldn't be surprised if somebody took the time to invent fuzzy measurement unities.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wouldnt call farenheit accurate, but these days it is because its a static number in celcius, which is also an accurate and static measurement that can be repeated billions of times.
Not because 0 is 0 :p
In the original farenheit definition my 0 farenheit was not your 0 farenheit hehe

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Touché but you know what I mean. It's the most logical to have absolute zero be zero.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Maybe in some scientific settings, but nowhere else. Why would it be logical to use a temperature system in every-day life who's base is set to a temperature that doesn't exist on Earth? Celsius and Fahrenheit are human-scale measurements, useful in daily applications. Celsius is a bit more logic-y, and Fahrenheit is intuitive.

[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But there are multiple that have absolute zero at zero
0°R=0K