this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
132 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14163 readers
703 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But don't worry, you will be at moderate risk of the car breaking down before 10,000 miles and you can't fix the part because it has been deliberately engineered so that mechanics can't fix it and it has to be replaced.

https://xcancel.com/unusual_whales/status/1987985187918192870

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

how could we possibly know enough about ancient egypt to quantify the wealth stratification at any point in time? sounds made up to me, even if it is believable

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a complex topic that I've only scratched the surface of, and of course with thousands of years of history there were multiple systems with multiple levels of stratification at different times, but during the time of building the pyramids at least we know from written records that the Pharoh in theory had extremely strong, centralized control of the country through a system of ownership of the land and its resources, which allowed them to marshal all of that labor into megaprojects like the pyramids. Later dynasties weren't able to do this, not because they lacked the technology or desire, but because economic control had decentralized to a degree where they simply couldn't control labor the way their predecessors did.

From there there's a lot of extrapolation, assumptions, and estimates, and it's totally valid to say that those estimates are too unreliable or that comparing an ancient economy to the modern one is an apples to oranges comparison and therefore not applicable. If we limit ourselves to just industrial economies the answer to the original question is still "no" but the data is much more concrete.

[–] AF_R@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because legions of scientists have dedicated their lives to studying it

[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

no shit. i'm asking about the methodology, obviously