politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
The post title is misleading, and I think looking at the article makes it a lot clearer what is happening and why:
In other words, prayer is being used as a form of protest outside the Broadview ICE facility. The solution, if you're the US government, apparently, is to ban prayer!
Its not just "in front of"...
They're not allowing any member of any religious group access to detainees.
As such, they started protesting in the "free speech zone", which is a tiny fenced in area that's literally and only there because you can't have your first amendment rights in public anymore.
They're not a new thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gje3HiouzvQ
Like, it's already not allowed inside, it wasn't allowed directly outside, it was only allowed in a small cage whose location the facility choose to keep protestors out of the way.
This is a very big thing
Like you say, prayer is only banned if it is being used to protest Trump and ICE.
But that's tantamount to saying "You can only pray for the things that are on the government's approved list." This should be pretty much just as shocking and offensive to most religious people as an outright ban on prayer.
Based on your excerpt, it appears the Trump administration has banned prayer inside of, and nearby, federal facilities, just like the title says.
What is misleading?
Based on the exerpt, it sounds like they banned prayer in and outside a single facility. Not all of them. Not even plural.
That makes much more sense.
Does it though?
From this regime? Absolutely
They don’t religion—specifically, Christianity—to be associated with sympathy for ICE victims.
Well we know Jesus famously hated prisoners and poors. /s
Truth doesn't matter, reality doesn't matter, their OWN MYTHOLOGY doesn't matter to them. Most of them haven't even read their own manual outside the dozen or so cherry picked verses that they use somewhat interchangeably for conflicting messages, once a week for 45 minutes.
Oh I know I'm still reeling from the hypocrisy after 8 years of Catholic school and that was over 30 years ago.
I read the title and came to this exact conclusion. I assumed prayer was being used as a form of protest and that was banned by the feds. What's misleading? Prayer is protected speech, even as a form of protest, no?
Title says "in," means within the grounds of the facility that these protesters were denied access. "At" would probably be a better preposition, or maybe 'around.' "In" implies that they've banned detainees from prayer.
Maybe it was edited but it says "outside of" now
Jesus famously said its only Christian if you use it to hate immigrants.
I would not call it misleading as not broad enough. It should say prayer banned inside and outside federal facilities. Its just like due process. Once you identify a situation where its not allowed then it effectively is completely not allowed as everything can be called that. Ironically protest is constitutionally protected speech or if prayer was not allowed for some other reason you would normally allow it when its a form of protest. Its so crazy illegal for them to do that.
They couldn't pass up the chance to simultaneously ban religious freedom and freedom of speech. Double-tap on the first amendment!
This is why many communities enforce the post title being the same as the article title. The title provided is incredibly misleading, whereas the actual article title is not.
Stand in the road with a upsidedown bible.