this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
66 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

14099 readers
672 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

so

uh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The nuclear option is changing senate rules by simple majority, as opposed to the three fifths majority usually required by the senate rules

Usually discussed in relation to the theoretical filibuster (I don't think half of them would survive trying to actually filibuster something), but not exclusively

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the hell is a theoretical filibuster

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you know how filibustering is giving a long speech to slow down congress? for a long time now, they've considered the threat "i'm going to filibuster" to be equivalent to actually doing so, and thus cloture, the vote to end discussion, which requires 60 votes, became a sort of theoretical filibuster. instead of an actual filibustering tactic, it became "you need 60 votes now" without the actual speaking. liberals, man.

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago

These ghouls would drop like flies if they actually had to stand and speak for that long. Let alone have to actually hold an idea to be able to speak to it