this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
39 points (89.8% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

14880 readers
27 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
07-23 SNW 4x01 "Valles Marineris"
07-30 SNW 4x02 "Griffin Incident"
08-06 SNW 4x03 TBA
08-13 SNW 4x04 TBA
08-20 SNW 4x05 TBA

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

did you somehow forget 7 of 9?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Whose whole character arc is about the female trauma of losing control of ones body and having it occasionally violated?...

....with a large dose of how to connect with your mother figures, even when one is being a bit of a Borg queen?

No, I didn't forget, and it's great that Voyager hit some gender specific trauma stuff consistently with 7 of 9.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That may be how it turned out in the end, but that story arc is absolutely not why 7 of 9 was added as a character on the show.

[–] Nico_198X@europe.pub 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you and @baines@lemmy.cafe are correct, though i consider that part of the triumph of 7. the writing and acting elevated that character way beyond the box they tried to put her in.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 6 points 10 months ago

i will agree that later she had depth

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

Some impressive gymnastics going on with the guy you're replying to...

What I remember people saying about Enterprise at the time was along the lines of "hadn't they learned their lesson with Voyager?" 7 of 9's outfit was an embarrassing thing non-trekkies would point to when characterizing Trek fans as "virgin nerds".

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Even with the backroom politics of 90s TV, they still cooked with the ingredients they were given.

Where as Enterprise thinks of its self as (according to the article) "a man’s man’s Star Trek"... and seems scared of the Me Too movement.

So yeah Voyager played the hand they were dealt, and surpassed Enterprise by far.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

she didn’t need to look like that to carry that message

please don’t pretend the point was sexy first

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How many nip slips did 7 of 9 have?

Jeri Ryan is just a good looking actress and spandex are very scifi.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not that I think going straight to the source will sway you, but...

Brannon Braga:

It was late, but I was so excited [...] He [Rick Berman] really liked the idea but he had the stroke of genius, 'Make it a Borg babe.'

Jeri Ryan:

I knew exactly what I was in for when I had my first costume fitting. Clearly my character was added to the show for sex appeal, which remains the one way to get attention very quickly. I don't think it's the only way to get viewers to watch strong women, but it worked.

So no, "spandex are very scifi" doesn't hold a lot of water in this case.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Whoa TV producers have sex-brained politics and just want mass appeal, you don't say?

Doesn't change the fact Voyager still did better on this issue, and the article says a lot about how a boys club mentality was embedded into Enterprise.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you can always go lower, there’s practically no bottom, doesn’t change the fact that crazy over the top outfit was purely to sell sexy

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Does the question: "Did you somehow forget 7 of 9?" read "let's limit the discussion to judging the women based on costumes alone" or say "Lets judge the character's strengths based on why TV producers had them introduced"?

No, the discussion - and even the article is about how Enterprise is claiming to be "a man's man's version of Star Trek" a "boy's club" and feel lucky they got in before Me Too happened.

So reiterating "Yeah, but TV producers really wanted Jeri Ryan to look sexy" doesn't change those facts, or the topic.

Voyager took what producers gave them, and still wrote a deeper look into gender trauma with it.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 2 points 10 months ago

what? no

I’m judging the tv producers

both had sexist elements put into the show

voyager managed to work around it

and the enterprise article is bait