ValueSubtracted

The Bombers lost Chris Streveler to a potentially career-ending injury in a fairly meaningless game.

Streveler has had serious limitations as a quarterback, which have been on full display this season, but he seems like a great dude, and it sucks to see him go out like that.

And with the BC win over the Riders, Winnipeg is set for a rematch (of sorts) against Montreal as they cross over to the East...

Klingon society is also deeply patriarchal. Women are denied direct inheritance and cannot sit on the High Council.

This seems to have been a relatively recent development (in TNG terms), as Azetbur seemed to be an uncontroversial pick for Chancellor.

And I think it does a disservice to omit Discovery's take on the Klingons, if we're taking about them growing with the audience. They took the feudal aspects and sprinkled in a healthy dose of xenophobia, which directly reflects cultural shifts over the last couple of decades.

Noted?

I'm begging you all, please report stuff that breaks the community rules and/or TOS - no one needs to put up with that nonsense.

Oh cool, GFR has finally gone mask-off.

This has always been the case, but I'm going to take this opportunity to state that links to that site are not allowed here, and will be removed on sight.

It bugs me a bit too, but I guess there's nothing really wrong with it being "the exception that proves the rule" - something extraordinary happened in that case, unlikely to repeat.

And the pre-existing time travel rules weren't exactly clear-cut, either - my original response glossed over bootstrap paradoxes like "Time's Arrow", where the characters travel back in time because they found Data's head in San Francisco, which was only there due to said time travel.

But then, from the perspective of people in the future, I suppose all time travel events look like bootstrap paradoxes...

the Prime timeline holds together no matter what happens to it.

This isn't quite true. Most of the time, Star Trek asserts that time travel to the past can and does alter the "prime" timeline - this is directly observed in "Past Tense" and "First Contact" (the movie, of course), when crew members who are protected from the alterations see reality warp before their very eyes. In those cases, the time travelers are forced to do what they can to "repair" history and get events to play out reasonably similar to how they orginally had. I assume things are still different, but they're considered "close enough".

The Kelvin event doesn’t just make a new branch going forward. The ripple hits both directions.

This is a little contentious, but I agree with this interpretation, even though the actual films are pretty vague on exactly how the alternate reality came to be. It's certainly a contradiction of basically every other depiction of time travel. But hey, it was a unique circumstance.

TNG's "Parallels" deserves a mention as well, since it states that their are infinite parallel realities (and we see a bunch of them).

In general, here's what I think is true:

1. An infinite number of quantum realities exist. These have nothing to do with time travel, and simply...are.

2. Time travel to the past can, and usually does, alter the future. Separate quantum realities are not created. These are the situations that the 26th century Federation time cops are concerned with.

3. The Kelvin Timeline seems to be an exception to (2), though I suppose there's a possibility that Spock and Nero simply tunnelled over to a different quantum reality, in addition to travelling through time. This is 100% pure fanon, though.

It really is a good thing that the relocated teams still tip their helmets to their former homes, even decades later.

🤞

I do hope the league is able to find some lessons that can be applied in other cities to boost attendance.

Thank you - this is what I'm here for.

I linked to the article!

I took it from a news article from last week, which suggests pretty strongly that that proposal is exactly what was implemented, and they never produced an updated graphic.

But again, I'd welcome a genuine correction.