this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13995 readers
1168 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

texas has been threatening to do it since time immemorial but i kinda don't think they have the juice

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, they didn't even do it first during the Civil War the first time

[–] prole@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The US Civil War is actually part of the reason Texas sucks so much today. A not insignificant number of people living there wanted to stay in the Union, at least 25% of people who could vote (white men) didn't want to join the confederacy. After Texas joined, they executed a lot of Unionists and most of the others fled. They lost generations of people who would have been the "moderate" wing. This is pretty much exactly what's happening now in states that are doing everything they can to push out libs and/or keep them out (example, OK is talking about testing teachers who move there for wokeness)

TX would probably be more like Colorado or other "purple" states. Not that this would matter much, I just think it's interesting

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Of course, Texas only existed in the Union in the first place because they fought Mexico for the "right" to own slaves so this so called "moderate wing" would still probably be like the enlightened centrist proto-Nazis at best