this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
126 points (97.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34457 readers
2076 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What do you think Lemmy is most biased about? Which opinions do you think differ most from the general internet?

(Excluding US politics, due to community rules)

Commonly mentioned biases:

Subject Mentions
Pro-Privacy 2
Left-Wing 9
Anti-Capitalism 5
American 5
Older 2
Pro-Linux 3
Tech people 5
Anti-Ai 4
Pro-LBTQ+ 3
Anti religion 3
Pro-Communism 3

Bonus: Gaming Biases

Subject Mentions
Nintendo hate 3
Pro-SteamDeck 1
Anti-GOG 1
PC over console 1
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately it’s just harder to be a Star Wars fan since Disney bought it.

Paramount is trying very hard to create the same difficulty to love Star Trek with their Section 31 movie.

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a rare defense of the movie... It was originally intended to be a miniseries but it got cut down to a movie when Michelle Yeoh won her Oscar and quickly became the most in demand actress for everyone.

While I hated the movie and most aspects, it was very much a compromise on the original vision and was in no way what Paramount was intending to make. It's hard to tell if it being a show would've fixed all the issues with the acting and characters being cringe af but at the very least it probably wouldn't have had the same pacing issues and extremely rushed writing.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't make it past 15 minutes of watching it. I bailed when it became immediately obvious this was an attempt at a Star Trek version of Suicide Squad of quirky misfits. That whole concept is not what Section 31 had been sold to us in the various Star Trek series'. What we were expecting were the best minds recruited across Starfleet performing morally questionable actions in service of their (possibly twisted notion) of the "greater good".

Julian Bashir working for Section 31 had no place in that movie version of the agency of the same name. Nor did Malcolm Reed. The movie version of Section 31 made a joke of 30 years of espionage and political intrigue.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sec 31 worked better as a subplot in the trek series, never should've been a show of its own

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think Sec 31 (version from show, not movie) could absolutely have worked as a standalone show. It would essentially be "CIA in space". As Sec 31 was a clandestine organization, they would not only have adversaries working against their chosen goals, but also other competing clandestine organizations (like the Romulan Tal Shiar or the Cardassian Obsidian Order) working to thwart them. There would be all kinds of wonderful stories of team ups and betrayals as their various goals overlapped.

When I think about that possible version, it makes what they actually delivered even worse.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Paramount ruined nutrek to be honest, at first they had STD to drive up subscription numbers. Having kurtzman was probably the worst thing for nutrek, he said it himself he dint care about the series