this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13967 readers
694 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am not deliberately starting shit. All I'm doing is engaging in discussions by leaving replies to comments I don't agree with. From my observation, this is also what many Hexbears are doing. When Hexbears do this, it's fine because they "don't have downvotes" and "have been very active for 3 years." When I do this, apparently I am "deliberately starting shit."
I am well aware of the fact that my post and comment history is public.
I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. You are deliberately misinterpreting my words. What I said was although his apologia were unacceptable, that does not invalidate his opinions on other topics. To make it extra clear, I did not defend the apologia by Zenz. I also do not condone what the Nazis did. What you said in your comment is slander and hurts my reputation. I would like to politely request that you take down the allegations.
Though Lee Teng-hui did deny the Rape of Nanking, the "war crime denier" was the first democratically elected president of Taiwan, which makes him one of the pivotal figures in the history of Taiwan. I certainly don't agree with his viewpoints on the Rape of Nanking, but I still respect him just for the fact that he brought change to the political landscape in Taiwan.
What's the difference? Your reputation is already shit.
Hexbear's reputation is worse though. Look at how many instances decided to defederate from you.
you look how many of them are still federated with nazis and transphobes and tell us again how sad it is those freaks defederated
I love how you guys are intentionally ignorant of the mainstream opinion about Hexbear. You look at the servers you got defederated from, talk shit about them, and pretend that you have not lost anything of value. This is the ultimate sour grapes mentality.
again, aww boo hoo all the most reactionary instances defederated from us waaahh
Aww boo hol we don't get to interact with libs like you that spread misinformation long after they're been showed to be liars? We don't get to interact with more people like you that thinks they're deserving of respect despite acting in bad faith themselves? We don't get to interact with idiots like you that somehow think an opinion based on nothing but lies and hearsay is something that should be respected? That's really too bad
Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad. But ultimately what's the difference? You already look bad.
A Hexbear calling me out for being a troll? Calling my claims rooted on dishonest bullshit? Wow.
This is your previous comment
Yes.
You see how you're making it difficult for anyone to take you seriously right
I believe that outside hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml there are very few people that would take hexbear seriously
ps. although the political ideology of hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml is very similar, I get a feeling that lemmygradders are generally more respectful.
And you believe people are gonna take the idiot that can't even engage with the simplest of refutations of his bogus claims seriously? Lmao
Yes, yes I do.
wtf
Post a picture of your dick, don't be a coward
If
Then why
Because I am salty and owned. Because I cannot stand seeing the opinions I oppose being so popular among Hexbears. Because I just want revenge. Because I love spreading US propaganda. Besides, can you tell me with confidence that none of the comment replies I got from Hexbear were made with the intent of making me look bad?
Of course they were made to make you look bad, you're clearly not interested in good faith discourse. We want to dunk on you, because you're a condescending little unimaginative impotent weasel
You are not in good faith discourse either. You people are also condescending.
Of course I'm being condescending, why do you think you deserve good faith when you've shown yourself to be a sad little troll? You're a dumbass idiot that have literally admitted you're doing this to make us look bad. You've failed to engage with well sourced arguments, instead moving the discussion to one of your "opinion" needing to be respected and the possibility needing to be taken seriously - There is no evidence a genocide is occurring, and your opinion isn't one that is inherently worthy of respect. Your opinion isn't based on facts, and your opinion isn't a fact either.
Are you actually this stupid you don't understand?
its our job to make nazi apologists look bad
Go eat some grass nerd
It's funny because calling you out on your dishonest and racist shit is the original source of your grudge against us
Now you come to our site for the explicit and sole reason of starting shit with us
And you act indignant at being called out for your behavior once again and act like you're vnidicated
As I have already clarified multiple times, I am not here to start shit. I am here to express my opinions, just like the hexbears do on those news posts on China.
You have just admitted you want hexbear to look bad you disingenuous idiot
sure
Post a picture of your dick
And how does this comment fit into that objective? Because this looks like you engaging with and in shit.
you should stop making ad hominem attacks and instead watch this countdown for an important message then click the spoiler below afterwards
Don't click until the 60 seconds are up, silly!
Ad nom on deez nutz ayy lmaoI did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.
His opinions about the "genocide"? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.
Not his. Theirs. The opinion of the majority of the WaPo team.
That's not what "I did defend Zenz on his opinions" means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you'll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?
Who gives a shit about some dudes opinions about the misinformation he's spreading?
Apparently both the WaPo and I do.
Neat! I personally give a shit about facts rather than what some dumbass loser thinks might be happening despite all evidence to the contrary. The Washington Post is a rag owned by Jeff Bezos, acting like it is in any way reputable is laughable
lmao
Did I say anything wrong? Was the process democratic? Yes. Was he elected? Yes. Was his title "president"? Yes. Did this happen in Taiwan? Also yes.
By this same logic, Xi is the democratically elected leader of China but for some reason you keep calling it a dictatorship
No? Xi does not even claim himself to be democratically elected by the citizens.
By the citizens? You didn't say that part lol. That disqualifies the U.S. as a democracy.