this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
59 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13835 readers
875 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The whole point of the test is that you're supposed to be able to parse these meanings anyway. It's supposed to be relatively challenging.

[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

At what point does the test become "do you have very specific historical knowledge that is functionally trivia for any real world use case?" though?

[–] HarryLime@hexbear.net 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They don't need to have the knowledge memorized. They had full access to google and a dictionary to look up anything they found confusing, and couldn't even do that. The test was of their ability to figure out a somewhat difficult text, not of their historical knowledge.

[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 6 points 13 hours ago

I didn't clock that they had Google access when reading through it earlier, I thought they were limited purely to a dictionary/encyclopedia lookup. That does make it a little more damning.

[–] forcefemjdwon@hexbear.net 10 points 13 hours ago

That's just what high literacy - which is expected of English majors, especially by their third and fourth year - requires.

According to ACT, Inc., this level of literacy translates to a 33–36 score on the Reading Comprehension section of the ACT (Reading).

In 2015, incoming freshmen from both universities had an average ACT Reading score of 22.4 out of a possible 36 points, above the national ACT Reading score of 21.4 for that same year.