this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
611 points (97.8% liked)

News

28981 readers
4179 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 141 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Fucking FINALLY.

I've been waiting for a small pickup like the old 90s 4-banger Toyota. And this is electric, simple for function, and actually affordable?

Capitalists must be seething. If it doesnt have leather interior, 19 speaker surround sound, and cost 80k, get it out of our country! /s

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Small gas-powered trucks are effectively illegal in the US.

It's regulation made in response to automakers calling everything a "light truck" to get around fuel economy and emissions standards in the 90s and 2000s.The straw that broke the camel's back was the PT Cruiser being classified as a truck by Chrysler.

So, starting in model year 2012, vehicle fuel economy standards started being based on vehicle footprint. The side effect was that small, powerful vehicles designed for moving cargo more efficiently or in tighter spaces than large trucks were impacted. It's why 2011 was the last year model of the old Rangers, S10s, Dakota, etc.

That's why the new Rangers are larger than the old F150s. They have to make them bigger to meet CAFE standards.

Same issue hit the small cargo vans in 2021/22. As the CAFE standards went up, it became impossible to meet fuel economy standards for the NV200, Ford Transit Connect, and Ram ProMaster City compact cargo vans, so they were all discontinued.

New York City was changing its whole Taxi fleet to NV200s due to their flexibility and accessibility options, and now can't buy new ones because a Toyota Camry has less-strict fuel economy requirements.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What are the Maverick and Santa Cruz classified as? I think they fit the small or light truck category, if they are categorized as trucks at all.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A Maverick is a light truck in much the same way a 737 is a small plane. Sure there are bigger ones, but it's a 4 door truck with a 4 foot bed that's high enough to make loading and unloading harder than it needs to be. It's twice the weight and almost twice the size of a 70s/80s Toyota Pickup, which is a light truck.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Twice the size how? Like, crew cab versus single cab? Not sure that's a fair comparison

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 4 points 17 hours ago

...park a maverick next to a nineties ranger; the difference is ridiculous...

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A Nissan Hardbody is one of the small trucks people keep complaining aren't made anymore.

Dimensions of the 4 doors variant: length 5.1m, width 1.8m, height 1.7m

Maverick dimensions (biggest model just to prove the point): length 5.1m, width 1.84m, height 1.76m

It's the same thing with all trucks, compared to the equivalent model (i.e. not comparing a 2 doors with a crew cab like the anti truck crowd loves to do) modern trucks look much bigger but it's a design and height thing more than anything, their length and width hasn't increased that much, especially if you compare with cars of the same model over the same period (1985 Civic sedan vs 2025 Civic sedan for example).

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (17 children)

If you think a 2nd and 8th gen Toyota Hilux are the same dimensions it might be time to visit an optometrist.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hybrids meet CAFE.

But their towing and carrying capacity versus the old Rangers and S-10s is pitiful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s why the new Rangers are larger than the old F150s.

If you're comparing a crewcab Ranger to a 2-door F150, sure, but that's not really a valid comparison.

Comparing equivalent configs tells a different story: every crewcab F150 is taller, longer, and wider than a new crewcab Ranger. The 10th gen and earlier (pre-2004) F150s, which are shorter than 11th gen+ F150s, are still bigger when compared to the Ranger in equivalent configurations.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

People can't seem to figure that out, to them a truck is a truck is a truck even though they're the vehicles with the most variations in size for a same model built the same year.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't get too excited about seething capitalists. Bezos is a major investor.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Article said it caught his interest, which to me means he took notice and will likely try to own it and enshitify it soon, not that he is currently behind it.

[–] sibannac@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

With all that user upgradability it's basically free real-estate for enshittification. Surley, the users don't know what they want.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Relatively affordable. It is 20k after the federal discounts and kick backs. Meanwhile, the Chinese EV market has been making cars as low as 4k. https://greenspeedx.com/cheap-electric-cars-available-in-china/

I'm not a pro China person (because one time in Ark, a Chinese team kept destroying my thatch base), but they seem to have the things. Apparently Mexico is aiming to compete in the EV market as well.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If by "the things" you mean underpaid labor, then yes.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago

Oh, the US has state subsidies too. They just get pocketed by execs.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America used to have the things as well but then there was a civil war and it got banned.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

semi-banned, under conditions*

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You might ask yourself what it is that allows them to produce and sell a brand new vehicle for $4k, basically the same price as a high-end PC or a couple of high-end smartphones.

[–] palarith@aussie.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

I dunno. Isn’t that what we need? Gov subsidy to increase the adoption of ev?

We might hit the Jevons paradox pretty hard though.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mostly automation and sensible regulations. Also direct to consumer sales with third party dealerships not really existing for new cars. Also generally a lower cost of living allowing for lower wages and thus lower labor costs for the non automated parts.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why is it that China is the only country on the planet able to sell new vehicles for this cheap? Surely other countries have automation and sensible regulations too.

[–] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

They genuinely aren't, Muerza in South Africa and a variety of other local brands across Africa and Asia have cheap cars.

China cuts it down further by completely subsidizing education and opening vocational schools near factories that specialize in what those factory owners need, allowing hyper specialization. When you have an entire neighborhood able to produce all the parts of a car, instead of importing parts from across the world and assembling it like us car manufacturers do, you're able to massively cut costs.

All manufacturing in china takes this approach of having almost enclaves of specialized knowledge and factories, and is genuinely an engineers wet dream to work in since you can get any part you could possibly want the same day, even if you just designed the part yesterday.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Even Europe has a tariff for EVs from China due to government subsidies. So it’s probably not 4K, but it’s also probably less than 25

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Chickens that dismount you and knock you out

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Capitalists must be seething

Capitalists funded this, that's one the benefits of capitalism, if the market is only offering pricey crappy products that people don't enjoy buying, theres an opening in the market that can be filled with a company selling people exactly what they want and need.

Yeah, I'm pretty hype for this. It's got just the basics of what's needed, and if you want to mod it with upgrades you can.

I only wish there was a way to make it AWD/4WD, and if there was a way for it to tow a little more weight, then it'd be perfect.

As it is now, it's still a very compelling concept that I might get into as outside of towing, it solves all the things I need a truck for.