this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
654 points (98.4% liked)

News

35692 readers
2805 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Michigan farmer Rebecca Carlson, a longtime Trump supporter, faces bankruptcy as Trump’s funding freezes stall a $400,000 USDA grant for hiring temporary workers.

Carlson, who hoped Trump’s second term would revive her struggling cherry farm, already spent $200,000 preparing for labor under the H-2A visa program.

With funding halted, she risks losing $200,000 more and can’t move forward with critical hires.

Trump’s new tariffs and immigration crackdowns threaten agriculture costs and labor availability, leaving farmers uncertain and frustrated with unmet promises.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 104 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

but I assume this is a face-eating leopard farm

In sooo many ways.

  • Voted for leopard, leopard's tariffs are screwing her over
  • Was awarded a $400,000 grant (under Biden) but now that's frozen, can't get reimbursed.
  • Can't hire H-2A visa workers.
  • "Nobody wants to work anymore" attitude
  • Complaining she had to spend $200,000 of her own money to renovate her house. Claims it's a business expense.
  • Can't use taxpayer money to pay her staff and can't stay afloat without government subsidies she would likely deny anyone else.

The usual "I got mine" attitude and subsequent whining when the consequences of their own actions finally affects them personally.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Did any Trump voters except billionaire Nazis pay attention to what they were voting for? Or was "he's a racist white man who will hurt minorities" actually all they knew and cared about?

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Trump is a vibe. Most elections are determined on vibes. Less educated white folk feel he's their guy. It doesn't matter that his stated policies will fuck them. They feel like he'll look out for their interests and that's really all it takes. Galvanizing this demogtaphic is how he won both the 2016 and 2024 elections.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 7 points 10 months ago

that vibe is fox news and other right propaganda

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"in this family we vote R since the beginning of time, we will continue to do so regardless to who's running for said party"

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There were a considerable number of voters who voted for Trump because he wasn't actively participating in GeNoCiDe. Many of them post here.

I hope they're allowed to stay in the country now, since I wouldn't count on citizenship status keeping those people from getting sent to Gitmo (or El Salvador)

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I had the impression those people were mainly advocating for not voting, or voting third party.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Which, in a two-party, first-past-the-post system, amounts to voting for Trump. They simply could not realize this.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, and each one of those people also contributed to his victory, and the shitshow that is happening right now.

I at least have some sympathy for the third-party voters. It's not their fault that expressing their opinion is meaningless because of how our elections are structured. But anyone who stayed home was effectively half a vote for Trump, and bear part of the blame for enabling his behavior.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Effectively they supported Trump, but I think it's misleading to say they "voted for Trump".

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

They may not have voted, but they chose the outcome.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the nobody wants to work bullshit sticks out here particularly to me.

Imagine doing backbreaking labor and you come home to not afford a damn thing. There's no way they don't see how expensive it is just to exist, but then snub their fellow Americans who are also trying to put food on the table.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nobody wants to work = Nobody wants to work for YOU.

Lots of people want to work, they just want a livable wage and good working conditions.

“Why won’t anybody let me exploit them?!?”

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

They're talking about waste and I'm paying for her fucking remodel from my blue state coffers? Fuck her business. Freeloading parasite.