this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
1354 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27720 readers
5566 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1354
My Honest Opinion (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 12 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Adobe is trying for the opposite. Content authenticity with digital signatures to show something is not AI (been having conversations with them on this).

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh I'm sure Adobe has the greatest of intentions on this. Such a reputable company that has a stellar past.

I'm sure they won't gatekeep this digital human signature in some atrocious proprietary standard along with an expensive subscription to have the honor of using it.

Don't listen to Adobe on AI or even better don't accept any "idea" or solution from Adobe.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah pretty much.

I recall flash, and how they absolutely controlled it. I loved flash as a young programmer too.

But in retrospect, forcing users to go through adobe to use something, with no alternatives? What a nightmare for a Open Internet.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How would that work then, I presume most would just ignore it because if it only verifies you used Adobe to make something it's pretty worthless as a "this isn't AI" mark.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

As valid and informative as TwitteX' blue mark.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It uses cryptographic signatures in the cameras and tools. Say you take a photo with a compatible camera, it gets a signature. Then you retouch in Photoshop, it gets a another signature. And this continues through however many layers. The signature is in the file's EXIF data, so it can be read on the web. Meaning a photo on a news site could be labeled as authentic, retouched, etc.

Edit: Doesn't require Adobe tools. Adobe runs the services, but the method is open. There are cameras on the market today that do this when you take a picture. I beleive someone could add it to GIMP if they desired.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

GIMP is open source, could someone then just tell it to sign anything?

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 1 day ago

Only with their private key.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And being adobe, they will put a nice little backdoor in it for them to change the credentials so that they can take artists' work and use it, train their AI with it, and sell it like they have been doing for years.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't change the credentials if the user owns the private key. But nothing stops AI training, that's part of the terms of service of some of their products, which operate outside the realm of this more open initiative.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Spoken like a real Adobe rep lol.

It's called a backdoor for a reason. Also since adobe software nowadays has almost full access to your machine, what is to stop adobe from simply uploading and storing your private key on their servers and using it when they like? They run their DRM client with a ton of rights to your computer on boot.

WhatsApp can do exactly the same thing and read every message you write and still claim it is "end to end encrypted" for example because key creation is through a process in their proprietary software.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Very nice idea in theory, but proving there is no AI involved in the creation of art is not something I think is remotely possible. It's an arms race more than anything, but I'm very interested in how Adobe will tackle it. I think people will be appreciating physical art more again, but even then we could argue about the usage of AI tools.

Anyhow, people will have to come to terms with the fact that AI is here to stay, and will only get better too.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 2 days ago

My other reply talks about how this works with cryptographic signatures, but sure, people can lie. The key to this method is if there is a signature from a reputable artist, news org, or photographer, then that origin can't be forged. So it's about proving the authenticity (origin) vs the negative use of AI.