this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
162 points (91.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

749 readers
47 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Vegans being banned and comments being deleted from !vegan@lemmy.world for being fake vegans.

From my perspective, the comments were in no way insulting and just part of completely normal interaction. If this decision reflects the general opinion of the mod team, then from my perspective, the biggest vegan community on Lemmy wants to be an elitist cycle of hardcore vegans only, not allowing any slightly different opinion. Which would be very unfortunate.

PS: In contrast to the name of this community, I don't want to insult anyone here being a 'bastard'. I just want to post this somewhere on neutral ground. I would really appreciate an open discussion without bashing anyone.

PPS: Some instances or clients seem to compress the screenshots in a way they're unreadable. Find the full resolution here: https://imgur.com/a/8XdexTm

Linking the affected users and mods: @Cypher@lemmy.world @gaael@lemmy.world @gredo@lemmy.world @iiGxC@slrpnk.net @veganpizza69@lemmy.world @veganpizza69@lemmy.vg @jerkface@lemmy.ca @TheTechnician27@lemmy.world @Sunshine@lemmy.ca @Aqua@lemmy.vg

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org -1 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Veganism isn't a diet, it is a social justice movement for animal rights.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

No,since veganism impacts way more than diet. Diet is only one part of it.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 5 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It can be. I know a lot of the loudest vegans insist this is the only acceptable definition. But that's not how language works. A vegan is someone who abstains from all animal food products, and usually all/most other animal products. Their reason for doing so is not an essential part of the definition.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the kind of nonsense we have to deal with.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not quite sure what you mean, sorry.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Carnists having a good ol' game of "muddy the waters, then play coy".

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, my comment was the alleged nonsense? In that case I disagree strenuously. The nonsense is one quite extremist vegan using their powers to silence other vegans from having respectful conversation.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Promoting animal products isn't abstaining from animal products.

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."

all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food

Being against the exploitation of animals is the main thing that sets vegans apart from the plant-based folks.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Veganism is abstaining from animal products. The reason is immaterial. Repeatedly asserting the contrary doesn't change that fact.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you're just going to ignore a part of the definition because it doesn't suit your argument.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've explained the definition here already. The definition given by one vegan organisation is not authoritative. Because definitions are defined by how words are used, not by how individual organisations say they should be used. I'm not going to keep repeating myself on this point. Catch up on the thread next time before responding.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The British vegan society was founded by the man Donald Watson as he coined the vegan word with his friends. Its not just "one vegan organization"

You're not vegan so you do not get to speak so authoritatively on the topic.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

The British vegan society was founded by the man Donald Watson as he coined the vegan word with his friends.

Already covered elsewhere in the thread. Read the thread before commenting out of ignorance and making yourself look like a fool.

[–] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org -4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is an actual agreed on definition of veganism by vegans, created by the vegan society who created veganism.

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

There is an actual agreed on definition of veganism by vegans, created by the vegan society who created veganism and coined the term vegan to describe themselves

Sorry, but that is just not how language works. One group does not get to define a term and insist everyone else uses it in the precise way they do. Words' meanings are defined by how they are used. And the term vegan is used in the way I described all the time.

A word's meaning can also change over time. Even if you were correct that the term was coined to be an ethical standpoint, that would not preclude it later evolving to have the broader meaning it does in today's society. That would be the etymological fallacy. But in fact you are not correct about that either. The term was coined by Donald Watson and Dorothy Morgan, because they wanted a more concise term for non-dairy vegetarians. The first time the term had caught on in the wider public enough to make it into a dictionary, the agreed meaning of vegan was "a vegetarian who eats no butter, eggs, cheese, or milk". You can thus talk about ethical veganism (which seems to be the only subtype of veganism your definition would accept), environmental veganism, or dietary veganism.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not really. It is a diet and a lifestyle based on abstaining from animal products.