this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
124 points (93.1% liked)

News

35749 readers
1954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A guy evaded a DUI stop, drove into a mall, and after the crash ran on foot and police unloaded on him making everyone think it was a mass shooting.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah. And this website looks very right wing so they don't include that perspective.

What was the point of shooting him when he was running away on foot?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

because cops are incapable of de-escalation in the united states. they are trained to be cowards. its literally in the book to aim for the head and body and unload the clip.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also incapable of winning a foot race.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Who just crashed his car

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Half the cops in the US are fat fucks

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Bad cop, no donut is a thing for a reason.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

I was surprised when I learned that the military has deescalation training. It makes sense, you don't want to be the reason why things suddenly erupt into a fire fight in an unknown situation.

You're safer being stopped and confronted by the National Guard or other division than by police.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What was the point of shooting him when he was running away on foot?

First time?

If you make cops run, they will at least fuck you up. If you've given them anything at all they can use to justify deadly force (like driving through a mall) and made them run, you are never seeing a trial. You've given them the emotional motive and procedural excuse they need.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Newsnation is doing that thing where they try to be "unbiased" but still hired Chris Cuomo.

They're doing that Semafor thing where they walk the line the first few years, but still selectively report/omit things so they don't get dinged on things like MBFC.

They used to be WGN, and own a shit ton of local stations in the rust belt as well, so I'm predicting they pull some Sinclair shenanigans eventually too.

It's not the biggest problem in America right now, but I've been keeping an eye on them with how often they're being posted now.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their landing page modal on my phone literally said "ONE NATION UNDER GOD" 😅

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And if you look at MBFC they lean left.

Because they're going right up to the line but not crossing it. It's meant to be a source that can't be immediately dismissed

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

According to the dateline, KXAN is the source of the news

[–] loanrangerofpeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Tennessee v Garner allows for this to happen. If the police believe that the fleeing suspect poses immediate harm to them or others then they’re allowed to use lethal force. He drive a car through a shopping mall and injured people. Cars are 4,000+ pound missiles.

I also want to point out that legal justification does not always make right. But at least understand the situation.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But he was out of the car already. Did they think he was concealed carrying another car on him or what?

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not familiar with the situation, however many of these car attacks are followed by knife attacks once the vehicle is disabled. They get out and run around stabbing people. Not trying to justify actions or anything, as I don't know the full situation, however that has potential to be a reason for the police actions.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tough one.

You're absolutely correct in as much that most European terrorist attacks start with a blunt force mass-casualty attack, and move on to a low-sophistication phase such as knives or swords, with some sort of improvised explosive endgame.

In North America though, it's not really an attack pattern that is commonplace - likely due to the high availability of conventional firearms making it easier to start and continue a mass casualty attack.

I suppose the line is drawn wherever it would become reasonable to assume that the driver was going to present a lethal threat to others in the vicinity after leaving the vehicle. I'm not familiar with this case in particular, but it's going to be a tough one to justify if there's no ongoing threat to the people in the area being presented.

e: wrote a word twice

e2: this comment has not aged well

[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

None of the articles I've read, including this one, indicate that the driver got out of the vehicle. This one says he was actively driving through the mall when he was shot.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Since when did evading arrest come with the punishment of death row?

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Always has, in fact there's a ton of controversy in places like where I live that made laws that high-speed chases for most crimes were not allowed as well as shootouts in public for most crimes if the criminal doesn't have a gun, since they kill bystanders more often than catch criminals with both of those. But the police unions and NRA have stirred up the conservatives against nonviolent capture.

This guy probably wouldn't have hurt anyone if he hadn't been fleeing. Sounds like he was just trying to avoid a DUI and they could have just took his license plate number and gone to his house/workplace to pick him up.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know, perhaps when you drive over people while doing so? Let alone right after someone did it in Germany and killed people.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Commentor before me said he was running away on foot when they shot him. After rereading the article it doesn't state whether he was on foot or still driving.