this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
583 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

16505 readers
1575 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So many dead children. I count a full one third of all deaths being babies and toddlers.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's the reason why so many misleading statistics claim a much shorter lifespan in the past. If you survived childhood, and there wasn't a plague around, or a war, you had good chances of reaching 60.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Life expectancy from birth is easily the most misleading statistic in the history of the social sciences because it is a measure of central tendency (aka an average, specifically, a median) of a property (age at death) that not only has no central tendency but actually has the opposite of a central tendency, with values concentrated at the low end (infant and child mortality) and the high end (old age deaths). In almost all societies ever measured, the life expectancy from birth age is usually the age at which a person is least likely to die.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

If you survived childhood, and there wasn’t a plague around, or a war

Lot of "ifs"