this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
524 points (85.5% liked)

Science Memes

20656 readers
1898 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (3 children)

TBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Some experts would argue it's already starting to be uninhabitable.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not build it in a remote location then?

Dams can also produce a lot of hydroelectric power, and a catastrophic failure could also destroy an entire town or more. We just don't build dams upstream of a large town.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

The Chernobyl reactor's explosion had impacts all the way in West Europe.

I don't think you can be remote enough with this.