339

Summary

Despite Trump’s criminal record, serial lying, and racist demagoguery, he won the 2024 US presidential election, reflecting America’s deep-seated anxieties and cultural divisions.

Trump’s celebrity persona, economic populism, and culture warrior appeals resonated with his base, while Kamala Harris faced challenges in defining herself and overcoming gender and racial biases.

The election underscores the decay of American democracy, raising concerns about the future of the nation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 239 points 1 week ago

It happened because Americans are easily fooled. This country has had all the evidence of what a total piece of shit this guy is, and they chose not to believe it because he played a business man on a fucking game show. It sucks for anyone who wanted to see America do well.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 124 points 1 week ago

Yup. With the high likelihood that Republicans get the trifecta, this country is about to become a lot more dangerous for my kids, both LGBTQ+, because dipshits believed that a "businessman" whose businesses all fail is good for the economy.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 week ago

Not just the LGTBQ kids. I worry about most kids. Child labor laws were getting more shakey already. Schools and education have been suffering. Healthcare also stands to take a hit. I'm worried.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago

Robert Kennedy is about to be put in charge of American health care and Elon Musk om our federal budget. When Musk said next 4 years was going be tough for the majority of Americans they meant it. Yet still majority voted for Trump.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

There will be face eating leopards like no one has ever seen before

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Honestly at least with musk theres a non zero chance he bankrupts the federal government.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

You mean default on its debt? I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump could be convinced to stiff the creditors, ignoring the implications.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Pretty much, either that or something as stupid as dissolving the IRS and trying to get sheriffs to collect taxes. The one good thing about Trump and company is that the smartest one still only has room temperature IQ.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's actually the plan.

Bankrupt the government and sell it off for parts.

[-] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they actually move as fast as Trump has promised to, the next four years are going to be absolute chaos. Anything that relies on federal funding will be mired in uncertainty - 23 million people work for federal, state and local governments.

Edit - not to mention the tens of millions more who work for contractors and consultants who have contracts with federal, state, and local agencies

[-] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Every kid's future just got worse because of the impending abolition of the EPA (among other things) and shift back to a "drill, baby, drill" approach to climate change.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Plus you can kiss education goodbye you can't get an educated man to go down into a mine. Or blindly obey your authoritarian leader

Honestly, I’m going to laugh long and hard at the economic collapse when it comes. These fucking idiot “captains of industry” wanted this. Enjoy the results, I guess. You’ll get a few good quarters, and then absolute, complete chaos.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The true captains of industry do want this. chaos is how they transfer wealth from the poor to themselves.

In a depression, the money doesn't vanish, it goes into the pockets of the super rich.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago

I'm tired of the "fooled innocent Americans" trope. Fuck that. They knew exactly what they did. Face the reality: half of Americans are now trumpists. FACE IT.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Yup. It's the Good German trope from the Nazi era. People knew damn well there was something awful going on.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've seen vastly more ignorance than evil in my life, but it seems like some people prefer to feel surrounded by malevolence.

[-] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Why do you think they are being fooled? If anything I think one of the appeal of Trump is the fact that he owns his corruption and shadiness.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

this election was lost by single issue voters not showing up.

Some of it is...understandable, albeit self-sabotaging (Gaza, for example,) others are on about abortion or the economy or immigration, taxes.

What they don't see is that there's so many issues a proper government needs to balance; and being a single-issue-voter is exactly what lets this happen. The sad truth is gaza is gonna get royally fucked now. Abortion is gonna get banned and women are gonna die; the economy is going to get wrecked so the oligarchs get to buy up all the cheap shit they want, immigrants are gonna get blamed for all of it; including the taxes because the oligarchs are too busy fucking us to pay their own damn taxes.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

this election was lost by single issue voters not showing up.

Absolutely. Look at the vote totals; not all votes are in, but Trump is actually running a few million behind his 2020 total, while Harris is 15M+ behind what Biden pulled in. Trump doesn't seem to have much more support than last time, but about 1 out of 7 voters that Biden earned did not vote this time.

The ones who did it over Gaza should prepare to be heartbroken when they see what Bibi and Trump do there next year.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

I mean I am also interested to see how many votes the fucking Cheneys brought in...that was supposed to be bargain they were making by tacking very hard to the right. If the dems lost on enthusiasm its because they were decidedly not running an enthusiasm campaign.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

None, I'm afraid. 5% of Republicans voted for Biden in 2020. 5% voted for Harris in 2024. A centrist waste

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don't know about that. I and most all the others I know were pretty goddamn enthusiastic about Kamala.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Absolutely.

And as for Gaza, they just announced dumping the MoDefense(?) because he wasn’t genocidal enough.

Announced it on election day as hopefully one last fuck-you to Biden.

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 22 points 1 week ago

The people that refused to vote entirely on the basis of the Gaza have effectively shot themselves, and everyone else, in the foot.

There was never a real choice to stop Israel on the ballet, but now with Trump in office, even deescalation is off the cards.

It must be great for these folks to be able to wash their hands of it like Ponchus Pilot, whilst Trump gives Israel the go-ahead to annhilate the people of Gaza.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There are multiple causes.

The main one? Nazis. By about a trillion percent.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

this election was lost by single issue voters not showing up

You mean, the candidate didn't do her fucking job pandering to the electorate? You mean the democratic machine didn't take their own rhetoric about democracy being threatened seriously enough to make sure to pander to every corner of the electorate to build the broadest possible coalition? You mean that the shitty electioneering consultants fucked up so much that they created a void for Donald Fucking Trump to show up to Michigan and get imams to endorse him as the "peace candidate"?

If you want to blame voters for electing Trump, blame the fucking white trumpist majority. Not the minorities that the Democrats didn't deign to try to woo and win their vote.

[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

They weren't fooled. They knew exactly what he is.

They didn't care.

That's the fallacy that us lefties kinda fall into, that if someone was just educated enough or knew enough or could see the facts, the person would change their mind.

The thing is, this was all about trying to get back at the left and minorities. "Fuck you I don't like the changing world I want my pretend 50s universe with no blacks and gays"

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

And also because his base is a cult. Which would require deprogramming.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

You say this like they would care if he's a criminal. I actually think they like that about him. At least a few million of these dickheads do.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

No, Americans didn't vote. The same thing happened when he beat Clinton. She went too far right and her base didn't vote for her.

All blame falls on the Democrats for failing to learn.

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think this is an oversimplification and lets Democrats off the hook.

A large part of how he won is to do with how polarised US politics are. The Democrats and Republicans are polar opposites, to the point that no matter who the candidates are the core voters could never conscience voting for the other side. Some Republicans may hate Trump but they will still vote republican as they see the Democrats standing for things they just don't agree with (whether that's Immigration or abortion or conservative values or fiscal conservatism etc). It just takes one; things are so polarised that it's inbuilt that it's a binary decision. The Democrats are just as guilty as the Republicans for carving up US democracy between the two of them. If you look at polls, they say 50:50 split but actually thats just "likely voters"; the underlying split is more like 1/3:1/3 with a whole 1/3 of the electorate disenfranchised and not bothering to vote. When they talk about undecideds, they're talking about 2% of people likely to vote; not the whole 1/3 of the election who don't vote at all. 3rd parties don't get a look in, and even get blamed for taking votes from the anointed of the two big parties.

On top of that, the Democrats really fucked up. The party leadership supported Biden running, and no serious candidates stood in the primary race even though he was already clearly a weakened candidate due to age. Then when he was finally persuaded to go at near the last minute, it was too late. They again didn't have a primary, they had a coronation, and then a short run to establish her. I like Harris but she inherited his team, his set up and was unable and unwilling to paint herself as a change candidate as she wouldn't criticise the perceived mistakes of her own incumbent white house. She focused on abortion, and could seemingly not address the economy in a meaningful way to appeal to voters.

I don't think it's because Americans are easily fooled. I think it's because both parties have created an extremely polarised political landscape which they have both used to their advantage to suppress 3rd parties and other views across the 50 states. In addition, the Democrat party tried to claim it was an election about "preserving democracy" and yet chose to do that by not enabling democracy in their own party.

Hopefully the Democrats will take a long hard look at themselves. And the good news, a slither of good news, is that in 2028 there will not be any Clintons or Bidens hanging around whose "turn" it is to run. The party can actually have an open primary and the best candidates can stand instead of feeling they shouldn't run. Would we be in this position if there had been a full primary and the candidate had been someone like Gretchen Whitmer, Gavin Newsome, Josh Shapiro or even just a truly independent run by Harris?

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
339 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS