511
Bitey (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago

Correct me if I’m wrong…. But isn’t finding a new bacteria rather common for people who look at bacteria?

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 59 points 2 months ago

Yes.

For a long time identifying bacteria required growing them on different media. If then bacteria didn't grow on the media,, we didn't know what it was. However for most pathogenic bacterium we did figure out how to culture them.

Then molecular biology advanced to a level where we can amplify and sequence a single bacterium's DNA. This has led to a continuous stream of new species discoveries from different environments.

Finding a new pathogenic bacteria for humans is still a rare discovery.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's new to me.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
511 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

11414 readers
1969 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS