405
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Elon Musk’s X is now worth less than a quarter of its $44 billion purchase price, according to a new estimate from investor Fidelity. 

The asset manager, which helped Musk acquire the social network formerly known as Twitter, now values its stake in X at approximately $4.19 million, based on newly released disclosures from Fidelity’s Blue Chip Growth Fund. The fund has reduced the value of its holding in X by a total of 78.7% as of August end.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 1 month ago

At that rate of wealth incineration he may be the Xer trump which makes me worried about future republican presidential canidates more.

[-] Naboo_calls_for_aid@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Just be glad musk can't run, seems enough people are oblivious to his idiocy

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 1 month ago

You know I might be turned around on him. Yeah hes a piece of shit intent wise but we we need to actually look what someone has accomplished. Wealth disparity is one of of the biggest problems of modern time and here he has gone and evaporated over 35 billion from the high end. He might be the greatest hero of the common man in our time. /s

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

This, but no /s. He's evaporated $35 billion from Twitter and is convincing conservatives to buy electric vehicles. I might like him about as much as I'd like a tick on my nutsack, but he is accomplishing things that align with my goals.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Like getting people to vote for a fascist dictator or attempting to incite civil war in the UK (and soon US)

[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Somehow I’m not as confident they wouldn’t figure out a way to ignore just one more law

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure the states could refuse to have him on the ballot, which would fuck over his ability to do jack shit. Also never underestimate American xenophobia, the fact he is South African would probably be enough to get him deported if it went to say a jury.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pretty sure the states could refuse to have him on the ballot

Like Colorado tried to when Trump was convicted of massive fraud?

If the cult latches onto Musk after Trump croaks, the corrupt SCOTUS majority isn't going to let pesky details like the constitution get in his way either.

the fact he is South African would probably be enough to get him deported

He's got triple citizenship, one of which being American making him much harder to deport.

Personally I'd love for him to fulfill his dream of dying on Mars, except without his "but not on impact" caveat, as soon as possible.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

On impact would be one of the best ways to go on Mars.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
405 points (97.9% liked)

News

23310 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS