578
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ElJefe@lemm.ee 39 points 1 month ago

I’m a millennial… aren’t we a bit old for this shit anyway?

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

We're going to be retiring soon, some of the older millennials, and they're still going to be telling us to have more kids lol.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

As a Class of 2000, aka OG Millennial, wtf are you talking about?

We're in our early 40s.

[-] ElJefe@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

That’s what I’m saying! Too old. Did you know the medical term for a pregnancy after 35 is geriatric pregnancy? Ya bro, we’re getting committed to the old folks home soon here, you and I.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Old folks home playing nothing but My Chemical Romance and Dr Dre + Eminem

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And some of us are getting ready to leave the work force, that was my only point.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Wtf "some of us?" You and Zuckerberg from what you're suggesting.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Americans who got lucky in life have a bad habit of shrugging off the majority that didn't as somehow irresponsible and not worth considering.

My cousin does this. Looks at you like you're speaking a foreign language when you say you can't afford something that would make your life easier like replacing a malfunctioning appliance right now.

Privilege is a bubble of willful ignorance akin to the Republican bubble.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Unless you're talking about FIRE, no: the oldest millennials are in their early 40s and have two decades to go before traditional retirement age.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think early 40s is a fine time to retire, if you don't have to support your children and you're in a dual income situation.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If you’re that 1% super elite CS student, then sure you can retire at forty. The rest can’t even if they are child free.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That'd probably only work if you met your SO immediately when you began working, and you both had the same money plan.

Otherwise it's probably not enough saved money to support 2 people, only 1 (edit until the later 40s)

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My wife and I make similar money and created a 20 year plan 20 years ago, we won't be rich, we just won't have to work. Think living off $4k a month for two people for life.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you do it over 20 years absolutely it can be done.

But to do that and retire in your early 40's (40-43.33) as you suggest means people will need to likely meet in highschool or early college and work on it right away once they start earning income.

Unless people happen to create a similar plan 20 years prior and are able to find each other many years into their plans. It is possible, but it's harder.

edit: changed the perspective to people, not specifically you.

[-] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The youngest millennials aren't even 30 yet, and there's lots of places where most people have children in their early 30s nowadays

[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Eeeeh, it's still technically possible.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
578 points (98.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9715 readers
315 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS